|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating | Regulated By |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 26.69 | ACUITE BBB- | Negative | Reaffirmed | - | RBI |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 15.31 | Not Applicable | Withdrawn | - | RBI |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 8.00 | - | ACUITE A3 | Reaffirmed | RBI |
| Total Outstanding | 0.00 | 34.69 | - | - | - |
| Total Withdrawn | 0.00 | 15.31 | - | - | - |
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuité has reaffirmed the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and short-term rating of ‘ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three) to the Rs. 34.69 crore bank facilities of Vintage Tiles Private Limited (VTPL). The outlook is revised from 'Stable' to 'Negative'.
Also Acuite has withdrawn the long-term rating on the Rs. 15.31 Cr. of proposed bank facilities of Vintage Tiles Private Limited (VTPL) without assigning any rating as it is a proposed facility. The withdrawal is in accordance with Acuite's policy on withdrawal of rating as applicable to the respective facility / instrument. The rating is being withdrawn on account of request received from the issuer. Rationale for rating reaffirmation and revision in outlook |
| About the Company |
|
Incorporated in 2010, Vintage Tiles Private Limited (VTPL) is a Gujarat based company and a part of Somany group. VTPL is engaged in manufacturing double charge vitrified tiles. The company has an installed capacity of 10,000 boxes per day or 120000 MT per annum. Mr. Rajan Jayantkumar Patel, Mr. Sandeep Ashokbhai Suthar, Mr. Jayantkumar Jerajbhai Patel, Mr. Nirav Jayantkumar Patel & Mr. Rahul Sharma are the directors of the company.
|
| Unsupported Rating |
| Not Applicable |
| Analytical Approach |
|
Acuite has considered standalone business and financial risk profile of VTPL and has notched up the standalone rating of VTPL by factoring in the operational and financial support extended by SCL to VTPL.
|
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Experienced management and long track record of operations
Incorporated in 2010, VTPL is engaged in manufacturing of double charge vitrified tiles. The company is promoted and managed by Mr. Jayant Kumar J Patel along with his sons Mr. Nirav J Patel and Mr. Rajan J Patel. Mr. Jayant Patel possesses over thirty years of industry experience, while both his sons have been associated with the ceramics industry for more than a decade. The promoters are ably supported by a team of qualified and experienced senior management team and mid-level managers. The team also includes representatives from SCL. The Board of VTPL includes two nominee directors while the technical team of VTPL also includes representatives of SCL. The team believes that VTPL will continue to benefit from its experienced management and long track record of operations over the medium term.
Support from Parent Company
As on 31st March 2025, SCL holds 50 percent stake in VTPL. The entire output of VTPL is sold to SCL which in turn markets it under its brand ‘Somany’. Further, the Board of VTPL includes two nominee directors of SCL and technical team of VTPL also comprises of representatives of SCL. Acuité believes that VTPL will continue to benefit from the support and benefits it derives from its parent company over the medium to long term.
Moderately Efficient Working capital management The working capital operations of the company are moderately efficient marked by gross current assets (GCA) of 112 days for FY25 as against 73 days for FY24. The elongation in GCA days is primarily on account of higher inventory levels, which stood at 84 days in FY25 as against 40 days in FY24, due to delays by SCL in taking delivery of the finished goods inventory. The debtor days are at 32 days for FY25 as against 34 days for FY24. The creditor days of the company stood at 146 days for FY25 as against 85 days for FY24. The average utilization of the fund-based of the company stood at 74.96 percent for last twelve months ended March 2026. Acuite believes, that working capital requirements of the company will remain moderate over the medium term owing to comfortable working capital cycle and buffer in working capital limits. |
| Weaknesses |
| Moderation in scale of operations albeit sustained profitability margins
The company’s revenue declined and stood at Rs.124.06 crore in FY25 as compared to Rs.148.71 crore in FY24, primarily due to lower realizations and reduced operating days during the year. Each major maintenance cycle entails a production shutdown of approximately 30–45 days, which limits effective operating days. Further, In FY26, the company reported revenue of Rs.113.78 crore owing to maintenance shutdowns undertaken toward the end of Q1 and the beginning of Q2. Additionally, due to adverse geopolitical developments and the resulting disruption in gas supplies, all ceramic units in the Morbi cluster were shut down from March 2026, with operations resuming only by mid-April 2026. As a result, production and sales were adversely impacted for a cumulative period exceeding two months during FY26, leading to a further decline in revenue compared to FY25. Despite the moderation in revenues, the company’s operating profitability remained stable, with the operating profit margin at 8.82 percent in FY25 as compared to 8.61 percent in FY24, reflecting its ability to sustain margins. The company follows a pass-through pricing mechanism, whereby increases in operating costs, including fuel and gas expenses, are passed on to SCL through revisions in realizations. Accordingly, the EBITDA margin is expected to remain range bound at around 8 percent. The PAT margin stood at 0.47 percent in FY25 from 0.63 percent in FY24. Nevertheless, given the company’s pass-through pricing arrangement, any increase in gas prices is compensated through proportional revisions in realizations to SCL. Accordingly, while gas price volatility may influence revenue levels due to changes in realizations, the company’s operating profitability is expected to be maintained, with EBITDA margins remaining broadly in line with historical trends. Below average financial risk profile The financial risk profile of the company stood below average marked by low net worth, comfortable gearing and weak debt protection metrics. The tangible net worth increased and stood at Rs. 27.27 crore as on 31 March 2025, as against Rs. 21.68 crore as on 31 March 2024 due to due to accretion of profit to reserves and increase in Quasi equity by Rs. 5.00 Cr. in FY25. The total debt of the company stood at Rs. 26.82 crore includes Rs.1.46 crore of long-term debt, Rs. 20.50 crore of short-term debt, and Rs.4.86 crore of CPLTD as on 31 March 2024. The gearing (debt-equity) improved and stood at 0.98 times as on 31 March 2025 as compared to 1.34 times as on 31 March 2024. Further, Interest Coverage Ratio also improved and stood at 2.02 times for FY25 as against 1.87 times for FY24. Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) stood at 1.00 time in FY25 as against 0.93 times in FY24. Total outside Liabilities/Total Net Worth (TOL/TNW) stood at 1.71 times as on 31 March 2025 as against 2.14 times as on 31 March 2024. Net Cash Accruals to Total Debt (NCA/TD) stood similar at 0.20 times on 31 March 2025 as against 0.19 times on 31 March 2024. Acuite believes that the financial risk profile of the company will remain below average in near to medium term owing to low net worth base. Intense competition in ceramic industry and vulnerability to cyclicality in end-user industry The ceramic tiles industry is highly competitive, characterised by the presence of a large number of organised and unorganised players. The competition, intensified in the recent past because of moderation in demand with continued challenges in the real estate sector. Intense competition restricts the profitability, given the limited pricing flexibility. Gas prices have remained volatile due to ongoing geopolitical tensions and war-related disruptions, which have affected global energy supply chains. In India, the impact has been more pronounced for gas-intensive industries such as ceramics, particularly in the Morbi region of Gujarat, where periodic supply disruptions and gas price revisions have affected industry operations.
|
| Assessment of Adequacy of Credit Enhancement under various scenarios including stress scenarios (applicable for ratings factoring specified support considerations with or without the “CE” suffix) |
| Acuité considers the benefit derived by VTPL from the support of SCL. While the rating is based on VTPL’s standalone business and financial risk profile, Acuité believes that, given SCL’s 50 percent shareholding, the company is expected to extend timely support to VTPL in any stress-case scenario. |
Rating Sensitivities
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action: |
|
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action: |
|
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
VTPL generated net cash accruals of Rs.5.33 Cr. in FY25 against repayment obligations of Rs.5.38 Cr. for the same period. The gap in funding requirement is met by infusion of funds by promoters. The average utilization of the fund-based of the company stood at 74.96 percent for last twelve months ended March 2026. Furthermore, the company’s cash and bank balance stood at Rs.0.09 crore as on March 31, 2025, and the current ratio also stood at 0.83 times as on March 31, 2025. Acuite expects VTPL’s liquidity to remain adequate over the medium term on account of track record of timely support by promoters and parent company in the past and expected moderate net cash accruals against repayment obligations over the medium term.
|
| Outlook: Negative |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 25 (Actual) | FY 24 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 124.06 | 148.71 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 0.58 | 0.93 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 0.47 | 0.63 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.98 | 1.34 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 2.02 | 1.87 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
|
Not Applicable
|
| Any other information |
|
None?
|
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Group And Parent Support: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-47.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
*Annexure 2 - List of Entities (applicable for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support) | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Contacts |
List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments |
| © Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved. | www.acuite.in |
