|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 27.43 | ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 89.57 | - | ACUITE A3 | Reaffirmed |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 117.00 | - | - |
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 0.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and the short-term rating of ‘ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three)’ to the Rs.117.00 crore bank facilities of Unique Structures & Towers Limited (USTL). The outlook is ‘Stable’. |
About the Company |
Incorporated in 1985 by Mr. VK Bansal, the company started commercial operation from 1987 with a rerolling mill at Chhattisgarh catering to the different power grids. In 1995, the company started galvanized steel structure fabrication unit for transmission towers. The company has been regularly supplying galvanized steel structures and towers to Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL), Indian Railway, Departments of Telecommunication (DoT) among others. USTL also ventured into EPC contract from 2006 and discontinued the rolled product division in 2014. Currently company is into Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) for Power Grid Corporation India Ltd (PGCIL), Indian Railway and Department of Telecommunication (DoT) among others. Currently the company is managed by Mr. Rishi Kumar Bansal, Mrs. Sonika Bansal, Mrs. Rekha Bansal. |
Analytical Approach |
Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of USTL while arriving at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Experienced management and long track record of operation- |
Weaknesses |
Moderate scale of operation – |
Rating Sensitivities |
|
Material covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position |
Adequate |
The company has adequate liquidity position marked by moderate net cash accruals of Rs.3.32 crore as against Rs.2.36 crore long term debt obligations in FY2022. The cash accruals of the company are estimated to remain in the range of around Rs. 3.62 crore to Rs. 4.39 crore during 2023-24 as against Rs.1.97 crore term debt obligations in FY2023 and in FY2024 respectively. The bank limit of the company has been 85 percent utilized during the last six months ended in September 2022. The current ratio of the company stood comfortable at 1.64 times in FY2022. The Gross Current Asset (GCA) days of the company stood high at 277 days in FY2022. Acuité believes that the liquidity of the company is likely to remain adequate over the medium term on account of moderate cash accruals against the long debt repayments over the medium term. |
Outlook: Stable |
Acuité believes that USTL will maintain a ‘Stable’ outlook over the medium term owing to its promoters' extensive experience and comfortable financial risk profile. The outlook may be revised to 'Positive' if the company registers more than expected revenues while improving its profitability levels. Conversely, the outlook may be revised to 'Negative' if the company fails to achieve the expected revenue or the working capital cycle further elongates or deterioration in liquidity position of the company. |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 96.68 | 100.10 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 1.77 | 1.85 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 1.83 | 1.85 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.97 | 1.05 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.63 | 1.56 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
None |
Any other information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |