|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating | Regulated By |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 95.00 | ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Downgraded | - | RBI |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 278.00 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Downgraded | RBI |
| Total Outstanding | 0.00 | 373.00 | - | - | - |
| Total Withdrawn | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | - | - |
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuite has downgraded its long-term rating to 'ACUITE BB+' (read as ACUITE double B plus) from 'ACUITE BBB-' (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and a short-term rating to 'ACUITE A4+' (read as ACUITE A four plus) from 'ACUITE A3+' (read as ACUITE A three plus) on the Rs.373.00 Cr. bank facilities of UMSL Limited. The outlook revised to 'Stable' from 'Negative'.
Rationale for Downgrade The rating action reflects the significant decline in the company's scale of operations, with operating income moderating to Rs. 191.86 Cr. in FY26 (prov.) from Rs. 363.17 Cr. in FY25, primarily due to delays in the execution of ongoing projects arising from departmental approval issues and delays in the release of funds by government authorities. The company had an unexecuted order book of approximately Rs. 571.56 Cr. as on March 31, 2026. However, the company secured only two new orders during FY26, which were awarded in May 2025 and March 2026. The company currently has L1 orders aggregating approximately Rs. 532.89 Cr., which are expected to strengthen the order book upon conversion into confirmed contracts, and the same will be monitorable. Despite the moderation in revenue, the company's operating profitability improved, with the EBITDA margin increasing to 15.24% in FY26 (prov.) from 7.68% in FY25, primarily due to lower construction costs during the year, as a substantial portion of project-related costs had already been incurred in previous financial years. Consequently, the PAT margin improved marginally to 0.56% in FY26 (prov.) from 0.51% in FY25. The rating also factors in the company's intensive working capital operations, marked by elevated receivable levels and high unbilled revenue, which continue to exert pressure on liquidity. The rating, however, derives comfort from the company's healthy financial risk profile, characterized by a comfortable net worth and moderate capital structure, as well as the extensive experience of the promoters in the infrastructure sector spanning several decades. The company's established track record in executing road, bridge, irrigation, and other infrastructure projects also supports the rating. |
| About the Company |
|
Incorporated in 1990, UMSL Limited is engaged in infrastructure development like construction of road, highways, bridges, pipelines, etc with its geographical span extending to Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra. The company was initially involved in providing specialised logistics solutions to various companies, however, since 2012, the company diversified into infrastructure construction segment which has been contributing a large share of the revenues over the past few years. The company also provides logistics services, which contributes a miniscule percentage of the total revenue, majorly to its group companies. Present directors of the company are Mr. Gaurang Bipinchandra Desai, Ms. Braja Kishore Mishra, Ms. Paramita Panda, Mr. Debi Prosad Mohapatra, Mr. Prafulla Kumar Dash, Mr Mukesh Agarwal and Mr. Sukanta Kumar Biswal.
|
| Unsupported Rating |
|
Not applicable
|
| Analytical Approach |
|
Acuite has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of UMSL Limited to arrive at the rating.
|
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Long track record of operations and experienced management
UMSL Limited has an established track record of operations in the infrastructure and logistics segments, with experience in executing EPC projects such as roads, bridges, buildings, canals, and other civil construction works, along with transportation of minerals and metal products. The company has developed execution capabilities through its presence across various infrastructure projects over the years. The company's operations are supported by an experienced management team, led by its directors and senior professionals, who possess extensive industry experience. Acuité believes that the company's established operational track record and experienced management team are expected to support its business risk profile and aid in the execution of its existing and upcoming projects. Healthy financial risk profile, albeit with a decline in debt protection metrics The financial risk profile of the company remained healthy, albeit marked by moderation in its debt protection metrics. The tangible net worth of the company stood at Rs. 376.89 Cr. as on March 31, 2026 (prov.), as against Rs. 375.82 Cr. as on March 31, 2025, with the marginal increase driven by accretion of profits to reserves. The company's total debt increased to Rs. 188.60 Cr. as on March 31, 2026 (prov.) from Rs. 146.71 Cr. as on March 31, 2025. The increase in debt was primarily on account of the infusion of Rs. 33.78 Cr. in the form of unsecured loans from promoters and the availing of a term loan of approximately Rs. 5-6 Cr. against land collateral to support the company's working capital requirements. Nevertheless, the capital structure remained comfortable, with the gearing ratio moderating to 0.50 times as on March 31, 2026 (Prov.) from 0.39 times as on March 31, 2025. The debt protection metrics remained subdued, as reflected by the interest coverage ratio and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.27 times and 0.95 times, respectively, in FY26 (prov.), compared to 1.33 times and 0.97 times, respectively, in FY25. Going forward, the company's ability to improve its scale of operations, strengthen profitability, and reduce reliance on external borrowings will remain key rating sensitivities. |
| Weaknesses |
| Decline in scale of operations, albeit improvement in profitability
The company's scale of operations moderated significantly, with operating income declining to Rs. 191.86 Cr. in FY26 (prov.) from Rs. 363.17 Cr. in FY25, primarily on account of delays in the execution of ongoing projects due to departmental approval issues, delays in fund disbursements by government authorities, and project-specific execution challenges. Further, the company received only two new orders during the year, awarded in May 2025 and March 2026, respectively. As on March 31, 2026, the company had an unexecuted order book of approximately Rs. 571.56 Cr., providing moderate revenue visibility over the near to medium term. In addition, the company has L1 orders aggregating approximately Rs. 532.89 Cr., which are expected to strengthen the order book upon conversion into firm contracts. Going forward, the company's ability to secure fresh orders and execute its existing order book in a timely manner will remain a key rating sensitivity. Despite the moderation in revenue, the company's operating profitability improved, with the EBITDA margin rising to 15.24% in FY26 (prov.) from 7.68% in FY25, primarily due to lower construction costs during the year as a substantial portion of project-related expenses had already been incurred in earlier periods. Consequently, the PAT margin improved marginally to 0.56% in FY26 (prov.) from 0.51% in FY25. However, the company's profitability remains susceptible to volatility in raw material prices, delays in project execution, and changes in project cost estimates. Intensive Working Capital Operations The company’s working capital operations remained intensive, as reflected by its Gross Current Assets (GCA) days of 591 days in FY26 (prov.), as compared to 314 days in FY25. The elevated working capital intensity is primarily attributable to high receivable levels. Debtor days increased significantly to 509 days in FY26 (prov.) from 251 days in FY25, mainly due to delays in the release of funds by various government departments. Consequently, the company's unbilled revenue increased to Rs. 213.80 Cr. in FY26 (prov.) from Rs. 189.33 Cr. in FY25, reflecting delays in certification and billing of completed work. Further, the inventory holding period increased to 48 days in FY26 (Prov.) from 31 days in FY25. The higher working capital requirements were partially mitigated by elongated creditor support, with creditor days increasing to 221 days in FY26 (prov.) from 178 days in FY25. Going forward, the company's ability to improve collections, reduce unbilled revenue, and efficiently manage its working capital cycle will remain a key rating monitorable. Susceptibility to tender-based operations Revenue and profitability entirely depend on the ability of civil construction companies to win tenders. Also, intense competition among civil contractors prompts players to bid aggressively to bag contracts and thus, restricts the operating margin. Amidst cyclicality inherent in the construction industry, ability to maintain the margin through operating efficiency becomes critical. |
Rating Sensitivities
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action: |
|
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action: |
|
| Liquidity Position |
| Stretched |
|
The liquidity profile of the company remained stretched, marked by modest cash accruals vis-à-vis its debt repayment obligations and high utilization of working capital limits. The company generated net cash accruals of Rs. 5.82 Cr. in FY26 (prov.) against debt repayment obligations of Rs. 7.21 Cr. during the same period. The shortfall in debt servicing requirements was supported through the infusion of funds by promoters in the form of unsecured loans. The company has a cash and bank balance of Rs. 0.81 Cr. as on March 31, 2026 (prov.), while its current ratio stood at 1.62 times. However, the liquidity position remains constrained by the intensive working capital requirements of the business. The average utilization of fund-based working capital limits remained high at around 95.15 per cent, while non-fund-based limits were utilized to the extent of around 87.93 per cent during the 12-month period ended March 2026. Going forward, the company's ability to improve collections, reduce working capital intensity, and generate adequate cash accruals to meet its debt obligations will remain key rating monitorable.
|
| Outlook: Stable |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 26 (Provisional) | FY 25 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 191.86 | 363.17 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 1.08 | 1.83 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 0.56 | 0.51 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.50 | 0.39 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.27 | 1.33 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
|
Not applicable
|
| Any other information |
| None |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
|
Contacts |
List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments |
| © Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved. | www.acuite.in |
