Experienced Management & Parent Support
TEIPL’s management possesses requisite experience which has enabled the company to grow since its incorporation in 2014. The same is reflected in the increase in revenue of ~55 percent from FY21 to FY22. Further, the company draws strong technical, operational and management support from its parent company – TBEA Shenyang Transformer Group Company Limited, China. The capital of the company is funded by the parent in the form or equity and external commercial borrowing (ECB). The company is also in the process of classifying the ECB as Quasi Equity basis of the communication from the parent, wherein, the parent is not likely to demand for the repayment of the loan. The reclassification of the ECB as Quasi Equity is likely to result in increase in Net Worth.
Acuité believes that the company will continue to benefit from the management’s experience and the parent support in improving its business risk profile over the medium term.
Healthy Order Book
The company has healthy order book position of approx. Rs. 1,385.78 Cr as on March 31, 2023 which includes domestic orders and export orders. Further, the company has around Rs. 300 crore of order under negotiation. This draws comfort to the revenue visibility over the next two financial years (FY24 and FY25). The company has reputed clientele which includes government entities and also large private conglomerates.
Further, the company recorded revenue of Rs. 1032.35 crore for FY23 (Prov.) as against Rs. 1,371.06 Cr for FY22 as against Rs. 881.59 Cr for FY21. The primary reason for the increase in revenue in FY22 is due to completion of orders that were received in FY20 & FY21. The decline in revenue in FY23 is due to depletion in order book in FY22 which translated to lower revenue in the current fiscal year. However, with the improvement in order book in current fiscal years, revenue are expected to improve in coming fiscal years.
Acuité believes that the company’s revenue may increase over FY24 and FY25 sighting the healthy order book as on date and the reputed clientele that the company supplies to.
|
Below Average Financial Risk Profile
TEIPL’s financial risk profile is below average, marked by low net worth, high gearing, and modest debt protection metrics. Due to net losses reported during last three consecutive years, TEIPL’s net worth has experienced severe erosion during FY22, FY21 and FY20, and, stood at Rs. 267.98 Cr as on March 31, 2022 against Rs. 392.63 Cr as on March 31, 2021, and against, Rs. 497.03 Cr as on March 31, 2020. This has also resulted in highly leveraged capital structure marked by gearing (debt-to-equity) of 3.50 times as on March 31, 2022 against 2.36 times as on March 31, 2021. Further, the TOL/TNW stood high at 7.19 times, as on March 31, 2022, against 4.91 times respectively as on March 31, 2021. Debt protection metrics are inadequate, reflected in its interest coverage (ICR) and net cash accrual to total debt ratio (NCA/TD) of 0.23 times and (0.07) times, respectively, in FY22 vis-à-vis 0.26 times and (0.06) times for FY21. The DSCR during the same period stood stretched at 0.24 times and 0.26 times respectively. However, the company does not avail of any long term debt funding.
Acuite believes that gradual and steady improvement in the financial risk profile will remain critical for overall business growth of TEIPL.
Working Capital Intensive Operations
The operations of TEIPL are highly working capital intensive marked by its Gross Current Assets (GCA) days of 305 days for FY22 as against 448 days for FY21. Whilst the company recorded improvement in GCA days over the past year, the GCA days do remain high. This is on account of its elongated receivable cycle which stood at 214 days in FY22 as against 213 days in FY21. However, the average bank limit utilization for 6 months’ period ended December 2022 stood low at ~18 percent for fund based limits and ~31 percent for non-fund based limits. The inventory cycle of the company stood at 23 days in FY22 as against 51 days in FY21. Further, the creditors also stood improved at 183 days in FY22 as against 193 days in FY21.
Acuité believes TEIPL’s ability to improve its working capital cycle over the medium term will remain a key rating sensitivity factor.
|