|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 5.01 | ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Assigned | - |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 42.00 | ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 8.00 | - | ACUITE A3 | Reaffirmed |
| Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 55.01 | - | - |
| Rating Rationale |
|
Acuité has reaffirmed the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and the short-term rating of ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three) to the Rs. 50.00 crore bank facilities of Stesalit Limited (SL). The outlook is ‘Stable’.
Further Acuité has assigned the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) to the Rs. 5.01 crore bank facilities of Stesalit Limited (SL). The outlook is ‘Stable’. Rationale for rating The rating action reflects sustained operations and profitability for FY2022, healthy financial risk profile, adequate liquidity position, extensive experience of promoters and reputed clientele. Also the rating factors in comfort derived by healthy order book position. Moreover, the company has booked revenue of Rs. 71.51 Cr for six months ended September 2022. The rating is constrained by intensive working capital, tender based business and competitive industry. |
| About the Company |
|
Himachal-based, Stesalit Limited (SL) was incorporated in 1981 is engaged in the manufacturing of products for Electric and Diesel Locomotives, Coaches, EMUs and Metro such as Transformers, Smoothing Reactors, Traction Motors, Coils, Alternator Mounted Rectifier, HVAC, Control Panels etc. Though the company is operational since 1981 it was taken over by new management in November, 2018 as it was under a resolution plan in National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
|
| About the Group |
|
River Engineering Private Limited - Incorporated in 2007, River Engineering Private Limited is an Uttar Pradesh based company. REPL is engaged in the manufacturing of high-end precision engineering assemblies, components, and magnetic parts.
The group consists of River Engineering Private Limited (REPL) and Stesalit Limited. Both the companies are referred as River Group. |
| Analytical Approach |
| Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profiles of the Stesalit Limited to arrive at the rating. The rating has been further notched up for group support from River Group. |
Key Rating Drivers
| Strengths |
| Experienced management
Stesalit Limited (SL) is engaged in the manufacturing of products for Electric and Diesel Locomotives, Coaches, EMUs and Metro such as Transformers, Smoothing Reactors, Traction Motors, Coils, Alternator Mounted Rectifier, HVAC, Control Panels etc. Mr.Rajeev kumar Singhal, Mr. Rajat Kumar Sharma, Mr. Pawan Ahuja, Mr. Alok Singhal, Mr. AniruddhKumar and Mr. Brij Mohan lal are directors of the comapny and have extensive experience in the engineering industry. Acuité believes that the company will benefit over the medium term on the back of established presence in the engineering industry for long period.
Revenue and profitability Post takeover of the company by the present management in November 2018, there has been significant ramp up in the operations. The company has reported operating income of Rs. 104.57 Cr in FY2022 as against Rs. 61.82 Cr in FY2021 (Rs. 9.58 Cr in FY2020). The company has an order book of Rs. 135.23 Cr and continuously bidding for new orders. EBITDA margin slight moderated and stood at 7.86% in FY2022 as against 8.75% in FY 21 and Net Profit margin stood at 2.76% in FY2021 as against 1.82% in FY 21. Financial Risk Profile The company has healthy financial risk profile marked by strong net worth and healthy debt protection metrics. The company’s net worth stood at Rs. 44.38 Cr as on 31st March 2022 as against Rs. 42.49 Cr as on 31st March 2021. There has been slight improvement in gearing levels (debt-to-equity) from 0.55 times as on March 31, 2021 to 0.46 times as on March 31, 2022. Further, the interest coverage ratio stood at 2.04 times for FY2022 as against 1.79 times in FY2021. Debt service coverage ratio stood at 1.63 times in FY2022 as against 0.64 times in FY2021. Total outside liabilities to total net worth (TOL/TNW) stood at 0.90 times as on FY2022 vis-à-vis 0.87 times as on FY2021. |
| Weaknesses |
| Operations in highly competitive industry
The company is engaged in engineering business and the particular sector is marked by the presence of several mid to big size players. The firm faces intense competition from the other players in the sectors. Risk becomes more pronounced as tendering is based on a minimum amount of bidding of contracts and hence the firm has to make a bid for such tenders on competitive prices; which may affect the profitability of the firm. However, this risk is mitigated to an extent as the promoters are operating in this industry for years. Working Capital intensive nature of Operations Company operates in the working capital intensive nature of operations as evident from gross current assets (GCA days) of 246 days for FY2022 (PY 386 days) and WCC improved yet higher and stood at 100 days in FY22 (FY21- 271 days). Inventory days of 94 days as on 31 March 2022 as against 151 days in the previous year. Further, debtors’ days stood high at 137 days as on 31 March 2022. Debtor days stood high i.e. more than 38% of the total revenue. As per the business trend the majority of revenue is booked in the last quarter of the financial year which was 45% for FY22 hence the debtor days remained high at the year end however the same gets realized in the next quarter of the subsequent fiscal. |
| Rating Sensitivities |
|
Significant improvement in operating performance of the company leading to improvement in overall financial risk profile Further elongation in working capital cycle Credit profile of River Engineering |
| Material covenants |
| None |
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
The company has adequate liquidity marked by healthy net cash accruals to its maturing debt obligations. The company generated cash accruals of Rs. 4.32 crore for FY2022 as against Rs. 1.07 crore of repayment obligations for the same period. The company has unencumbered cash and bank balances of Rs. 0.80 crore as on 31st March 2022 Further, the fund-based working capital limits are utilized at an average of ~ 52 per cent in the last 12 months ended January 23. Therefore, there are enough net cash accruals & limits available to utilize more funds if required to support incremental requirements
|
| Outlook: Stable |
|
Acuité believes SL will maintain a ‘Stable’ business risk profile over the medium term. The company will continue to benefit from its experienced management. The outlook may be revised to ‘Positive’ in case the company registers significant growth in revenues along with the operating margins. Conversely, the outlook may be revised to ‘Negative’ in case of deterioration in its business risk profile, thereby impacting its financial risk profile, particularly its liquidity.
|
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 104.57 | 61.82 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 2.88 | 1.13 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 2.76 | 1.82 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.46 | 0.55 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 2.04 | 1.79 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
| None |
| Any other information |
| None |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Entities In Manufacturing Sector:- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
| |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
| Analytical | Rating Desk |
| About Acuité Ratings & Research |
