|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating | Regulated By |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 20.00 | ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Reaffirmed | - | RBI |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 0.00 | 70.00 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed | RBI |
| Total Outstanding | 0.00 | 90.00 | - | - | - |
| Total Withdrawn | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | - | - |
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuité has reaffirmed its long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B Plus) on Rs. 20.00 Cr. bank facilities and reaffirmed its short term rating of ‘ACUITE A4+’ (read as ACUITE A four plus) on Rs.70.00 Cr. bank facilities of Sri Sai Lakshmi Constructions and Co (SSLC). The outlook is ‘Stable’.
Rationale for rating: The rating reaffirmation takes into account stagnant scale of operations in FY25 & FY26 owing to delay in executions while outstanding order book remains healthy at ~Rs.928 Cr. as on 31st March 2026. Additionally, the rating derives comfort from moderate financial risk profile with low debt profile and comfortable debt protection metrics. However, rating remains constrained to the firm’s high working capital-intensive operations involving work in progress and retention receivables. The rating also factors the risk of capital withdrawal owing to partnership nature of business. Going forward, ability of the firm to scale up its operations backed by timely execution of its order book while maintaining its profitability margins will continue to remain a key rating monitorable.
|
| About the Company |
|
Incorporated in 1997, Sri Sai Lakshmi Constructions and Co (SSLC) is a partnership firm engaged in the business of civil construction and primarily undertakes irrigation works in Andhra Pradesh (AP) and Telangana. The firm is promoted by Mr. K. Venkateswara Rao and Mr. G. Ratna Prakash along with 7 other partners.
|
| Unsupported Rating |
| Not Applicable |
| Analytical Approach |
|
Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of SSLC to arrive at the rating.
|
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Established track record of operations supported by experienced management
SSLC possesses an established track record of over two decades in infrastructure development, specializing in irrigation projects across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under the leadership of its founding promoters, Mr. K. Venkateswara Rao and Mr. G. Ratna Prakash, who are supported by an experienced team of professionals. Moderate financial risk profile Financial risk profile of the firm stood moderate marked by improved net worth, low gearing and comfortable debt protection metrics. The tangible net worth stood at Rs.132.65 Cr. as on 31st March 2026(Prov.) as against Rs.126.20 Cr. as on 31st March 2025 including quasi equity of Rs.10 Cr. The gearing (debt-equity) has remained below unity over the years. The overall Debt- EBITDA stood at 1.46 times in FY 26 (Prov.) against 1.51 times in FY 25. However, net worth remains susceptible to capital withdrawal considering partnership nature of business. |
| Weaknesses |
| Stagnant scale of operation due to delay in project execution
The revenue of the firm has grown at a sluggish pace with Rs. 135.96 Cr. in FY 26 (Prov.) compared to Rs. 131.23 Cr. in FY 25, owing to delay in project executions on account of land acquisition issues and delay in fund releasing by the state government. However, the current unexecuted order book of ~Rs. 928 Cr. as of 31st March 2026. Of these orders worth Rs 393 Cr. pertains to FY23-FY25 which, highlights a heavy backlog despite providing revenue visibility over the medium term.
Furthermore, operational efficiency has consistently strengthened, with EBITDA margins improving from 7.69% in FY25 to 8.58% in FY 26 (Prov.), though profitability remains susceptible to fluctuations in raw material procurement costs depending on the execution stage of ongoing contracts. Going forward, the EBITDA margin is projected to stabilize between 8.50- 8.60%. Meanwhile, the PAT margin stood at 5.95% in FY26 (Prov.), recovering from 4.87% in FY 25, majorly due to increased non-operating income which consists of FDR interest received, rent received, interest received on IT refund and seigniorage charges. Working capital intensive operations The working capital operations of SSLC are highly intensive, driven by its elevated gross current assets (GCA) of 499 days for FY 26 (Prov.) as against 471 days for FY 25. This stagnation is mainly driven by massive retention money locked up with the government and a significant increase in inventory days and debtors’ days. The firm’s debtor days remain structurally trapped as public sector fund releases are heavily back ended toward the fiscal year-end; consequently, despite standard credit terms of 60 to 90 days, approximately 60% of project revenue is delayed and only realized during the year-end period. The inventory days includes work in progress which stood stretched at 97 days in FY 26 (Prov.) against 90 days in FY 25. Further, the creditors cycle was sharply compressed to 18 days in FY 26 (Prov.) as against 40 days in FY 25. Moreover, the working capital is expected to remain highly stressed and intensive over the medium term considering the volatile nature of business.
Tender based nature of operations, competitive & fragmented industry SSLC is into irrigation projects, wherein the sector is marked by the presence of several mid to large sized players. The risk becomes more pronounced as tendering is based on minimum amount of bidding on contracts and there exists susceptibility to inherent cyclicality in the infrastructure segment. Further, project announcements is dependent on state government's thrust on irrigation and other infrastructure works.
Therefore, Acuité believes that SSLC's revenues and margins are susceptible to the competitive bidding scenario, along with the geographical concentration of its projects to the states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. |
Rating Sensitivities
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action: |
|
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action: |
|
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
The firm’s liquidity position is adequate marked by sufficient net cash accruals against its maturing debt obligations. The firm's net cash accruals stood higher at Rs.11.09 Cr. in FY26(Prov.) with maturing debt obligations of Rs.1.47 Cr. in FY 26 (Prov.). Going forward, it is expected to generate a sufficient cash accrual in the range of Rs.12-13 Cr against the maturing repayment obligations in the range of Rs.0.34 -0.40 Cr. over the medium term. However, the reliance on working capital is high as evident by the bank limit utilization. The average bank limit utilization for fund-based limits stood at ~ 92 percent for the last 12 months ended May 2026; and the non-fund-based limits stands utilized at 79% during the same period. The company had an unencumbered cash and bank balance of Rs. 1.06 Cr. as on 31st March , 2026 (Prov.). Further the current ratio stood at 2.54 times in FY 26 (Prov.)
|
| Outlook: |
| Stable |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None. |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 26 (Provisional) | FY 25 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 135.96 | 131.23 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 8.09 | 6.39 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 5.95 | 4.87 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 4.20 | 4.18 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
| Not Applicable. |
| Any other information |
| None. |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
| |
|
Contacts |
List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments |
| © Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved. | www.acuite.in |
