|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 40.33 | ACUITE BB+ | Negative | Downgraded | Stable to Negative | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 118.17 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Downgraded |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 158.50 | - | - |
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 0.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has downgraded the long term rating to ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B plus) from ‘ACUITE BBB-‘(read as ACUITE triple B minus) and the short term rating to ‘ACUITE A4+’ (read as ACUITE A four plus) from ‘ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three) to the Rs.158.50 Cr bank facilities of Siddhartha Engineering Limited (SEL). |
About the Company |
SEL is an Orissa based entity which was established in 1972 as a partnership firm and reconstituted as private limited company in 1986, subsequently as public limited company with the present name in 2008. The company is engaged in design, supply, erection, and commission and testing of electrical substations for various government organizations. Currently, the company is managed by Mr. Sudhansu Sekhar Palo, Mr. Sidhartha Palo and Mrs. Madhuri Palo. |
Analytical Approach |
Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of SEL while arriving at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Long track record of operation and experienced management- |
Weaknesses |
Moderate scale of operation – |
Rating Sensitivities |
|
Material covenants |
No |
Liquidity Position |
Stretched |
The company has a stretched liquidity position marked by almost full utilization of bank limits in the past 3 months ended December’22. This has also led to LC devolvements in November’22. The working capital intensity of the company is marked by high gross current asset (GCA) days 414 days in FY2022. However, the net cash accruals of Rs.5.65 crore as against Rs.2.82 crore long term debt obligations in FY2022. The cash accruals of the company are estimated to remain in the range of around Rs. 7.94 crore to Rs.9.32 crore during 2023-24 as against Rs.2.96 crore of long term debt obligations in FY2023 and Rs,.1.79 crore in FY2024 respectively. The current ratio of the company stood comfortable at 1.65 times in FY2022. Acuité believes that the liquidity of the company is likely to remain stretched over the medium term on account of elongated working capital management marked by continuous increasing of collection period. |
Outlook: Negative |
Acuité has revised the outlook on SEL to ‘Negative’ on account high working capital intensity leads to a deterioration in their liquidity position. The rating may be downgraded if there is further elongation in debtors leading to a further deterioration in liquidity. The outlook may be revised to 'Stable ' if there is a significant improvement in the receivables position of the company thus providing comfort to the liquidity position. Also, the company has to maintain their financial risk profile parameters. |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 94.65 | 93.78 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 4.75 | 5.23 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 5.02 | 5.57 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.76 | 0.58 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 2.05 | 2.04 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
Care Ratings vide its press release dated 24.11.2022, had reaffirmed the company to CARE BB-/A4; INC. |
Any other information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm • Service Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-50.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in. |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |