Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating Regulated By
Bank Loan Ratings 0.00 10.00 ACUITE A- | Stable | Assigned - RBI
Bank Loan Ratings 0.00 71.00 - ACUITE A2+ | Assigned RBI
Total Outstanding 0.00 81.00 - - -
Total Withdrawn 0.00 0.00 - - -
Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.
 
Rating Rationale

Acuité has assigned the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE A-(read as ACUITE A minus) and short-term rating of 'ACUITE A2+' (read as ACUITE A two plus) on Rs. 81.00 Cr. bank facilities of Shri Swami Samarth Engineers Limited (SSSEL). The outlook is 'Stable'.

Rationale for rating assigned
The rating assigned takes into account established presence of the company in the engineering procurement & construction (EPC) industry with continued growth in the scale of operations at healthy operating margins. Also, the rating factors long-standing experience of the promoters in the civil construction sector. Furthermore, the rating factors the improving financial risk profile of the company with healthy net worth supported by equity infusions and moderately intensive working capital operations. Moreover, the rating takes into account the current outstanding order book of ~Rs. 1181.27 Cr. as of May 31, 2026, providing revenue visibility over the medium term, expected to improve further with orders under bidding pipeline which shall remain key rating monitorable. However, the rating is constrained on account of customer and geographical concentration risks along with loans & advances given to group companies, timely recovery of which remains monitorable. Further, the rating also factors inherent risks faced in the construction business such as exposure to intense competition, tender based nature of operations, delays faced by the projects and susceptibility of operating margins to volatility in input prices and labour charges.


About the Company

Incorporated in 2019, Pune based, Shri Swami Samarth Engineers Limited (SSSEL) is an EPC company engaged in government-registered civil engineering works such as construction of roads, flyovers, bridges, canals, dams, and other infrastructure developments. The company is registered as Class I-A Government Contractor with the Public Works Departments of Maharashtra, Karnataka, and the Central Government. Earlier, the entity was established as a partnership firm by Mr. Bhaskar Mane in 1998, Shri Swami Samarth Engineers which was reconstituted as a closely held public limited company in 2019. The directors of the company are Mrs. Ranjana Bhaskar Mane, Mr. Vikramsinh Vijaykumar Patil, Mr. Krishandeo Chandrakant Tambile, Mr. Indrajit Dattajirao Deshamukh and Mr. Abhijeet Balasaheb Thorat.

 
Unsupported Rating
­Not Applicable
 
Analytical Approach

­Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profiles of SSSEL to arrive at the rating.

 
Key Rating Drivers

Strengths

Established track record of operations and experienced management
The company has a long track record of almost three decades in the civil construction business with an established track record of project execution related to construction of irrigation, highways & roads projects on EPC basis. The company has successfully executed projects for prominent counterparties National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH), Maharashtra State Infrastructure Development Corporation (MSIDC), Public Works Department (PWD), Water Resources Department (WRD), and other government bodies. The promoters, Mr. Bhaskar Mane and Mr. Ganesh Bhaskar Mane Deshmukh, have nearly three decades of experience in the civil construction industry leading to established relationships with key stakeholders.

Growing scale of operations
The operating revenue of the company improved to Rs. 630.37 Cr. in FY26 as compared to Rs. 432.42 Cr. in FY25, reflecting an y-o-y growth of ~46 percent in FY26, on the back of higher execution of contract order during the year. The growth is supported by improving order book position, with unexecuted orders of around Rs. 1181.27 Cr. as of May 31, 2026, providing revenue visibility over the near to medium term. The company’s revenue profile is majorly derived from road projects, which contributed ~78 percent of its revenue in FY26, while irrigation projects accounted for ~20 percent. Further, the operating margins stood healthy at 18 percent in FY26 (19.10 percent in FY25) on account of self-execution of orders and utilising their own construction equipment. Moreover, the company has clocked revenue of Rs. 69.73 Cr. in 2MFY27 (Rs. 22.59 Cr. in 2MFY26). Going forward, the continued growth momentum with steady increase in order book position shall remain monitorable.

Improving financial risk profile on account of continuous equity infusions
The financial risk profile of the company is marked by healthy net worth of Rs. 236.85 Cr. as on March 31, 2026, as compared to Rs. 151.03 Cr. as on March 31, 2025, improved on account of accretion of profits to reserves and equity infusions by the promoters amounting to Rs. 17.55 Cr. in FY25, Rs. 29.52 Cr. in FY26. Also, the promoters have infused equity amounting to ~Rs. 18 Cr. in FY27. Further, the debt profile of the company stood at Rs. 204.79 Cr. as on March 31, 2026 (Rs. 204.27 Cr. as on March 31, 2025), consisting majorly of construction equipment loan and working capital borrowings. Therefore, the gearing (debt/equity) ratio stood moderate at 0.86 times in FY26, though improved from 1.35 times in FY25. Moreover, TOL/TNW stood improved at 1.39 times in FY26 as against 1.91 times in FY25. Furthermore, the debt protection metrics stood comfortable marked by interest coverage ratio of 4.20 times in FY26 and debt service coverage ratio of 1.38 times in FY26.
Going forward, the financial risk profile of the company is expected to improve on the back of improving cash accruals and equity infusions with no major debt funded capex plan envisaged in the medium term.

Moderately intensive working capital operations
While the working capital operations of the company stood moderately intensive, however, gross current assets (GCA) stood improved at 132 days in FY26 (169 days in FY25), primarily driven by debtor levels, inventory levels and higher other current assets (majorly consisting of advances to suppliers). The inventory days stood decreased at 32 days in FY26 from 63 days in FY25 on account of higher order executions in FY26. Further, the receivables also stood reduced at 65 days in FY26 (81 days in FY25). Moreover, the company receives an average credit period of 60-90 days from their suppliers leading to creditor days of 65 days in FY26 (78 days in FY25). Going forward, the working capital operations are expected to remain in similar levels considering the nature of industry.


Weaknesses

Customer and geographical concentration risk
The company is exposed to customer concentration risk, with its top five clients contributing ~77 percent of total revenue in FY26. This risk is partially offset by the company’s established relationships with these clients. Also, the company faces geographical concentration risk with ~83 percent of the revenue in FY26 contributed from Maharashtra and ~17 percent from Karnataka. Moreover, the current order book continues to reflect a similar regional concentration, however, the company has identified new tenders in different geographies, receipt of which shall diversify concentration risks.

Loans & advances given to group companies
The company has extended interest bearing loans & advances amounting to Rs. 42.46 Cr. (~17.93 percent of its net worth) as of March 31, 2026, in the group companies. While some of the recovery is expected in the medium term, any significant investments to such entities constraining the company’s core operations thereby impacting the liquidity, remains a key rating sensitivity.

Exposure to intense competition and tender-based operations
The infrastructure industry is a fragmented industry with a presence of large players pan India where subcontracting & project specific partnerships for technical/financial reasons are common. The revenue and profitability for tendering based operations depends entirely on the ability to win tenders wherein entities face intense competition, thus requiring them to bid aggressively to procure contracts. However, high entry barriers in terms of technical qualifications and past track record of the company in execution of similar projects mitigates the risk to a certain extent. Moreover, susceptibility of raw material pricing keeps profitability margins vulnerable, however, it is mitigated to some extent with price escalation clauses in every order. Furthermore, there exists project execution risk inherent in infrastructure projects owing to delays such as timely land acquisition, approvals from regulatory bodies.
Going forward, the company's ability to sustain its order inflow, timely order execution and sustaining profitability amid a competitive industry shall remain a key rating monitorable.

Rating Sensitivities

Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action:
  •  
  • Growth in operating performance with timely project execution leading to generation of net cash accruals of more than Rs. 100 Cr.
  • Improvement in financial risk profile and working capital intensity
  •  
Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action:
  • Delay in order execution or slowdown in orderbook growth leading to generation of net cash accruals below Rs. 60 Cr.
  • Significant increase in debt levels, thereby, impacting the financial risk profile
  • Significant elongation in working capital intensity
Liquidity Position
Adequate

The company’s liquidity position is adequate marked by sufficient cash accruals of Rs. 71.18 Cr. in FY26 as against maturing debt obligations of Rs. 43.82 Cr. for the same period. Going forward, the cash accruals are expected to be in the range of Rs. 90-100 Cr. for the period FY27 and FY28 against maturing debt obligations in the range of Rs. 45-60 Cr. for the same period. Further, the utilisation for working capital limits stood moderate as reflected by average fund-based limit utilisations of 80.31 percent for the past twelve months ended May 2026 and outstanding utilisation of non-fund-based limit stood at 68.20 percent as on June 15, 2026. Further, the current ratio stood modest at 1.14 times in FY26 while the cash and bank balances stood increased at Rs. 25.80 Cr. as on March 31, 2026 (Rs. 4.93 Cr. as on March 31, 2025).

 
Outlook: Stable
­
 
Other Factors affecting Rating
­None
 

Particulars Unit FY 26 (Actual) FY 25 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 630.37 432.42
PAT Rs. Cr. 56.28 30.17
PAT Margin (%) 8.93 6.98
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 0.86 1.35
PBDIT/Interest Times 4.20 4.65
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable)
­None
 
Any other information
­None
 
Applicable Criteria
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument


Rating History :
Not Applicable­
 

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Listing Status Regulated By Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum
(Rs. Cr.)
Complexity Level Rating
H D F C Bank Limited Not avl. / Not appl. Bank Guarantee (BLR) Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 57.00 Simple ACUITE A2+ | Assigned
H D F C Bank Limited Not avl. / Not appl. Cash Credit Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 10.00 Simple ACUITE A- | Stable | Assigned
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Short Term Bank Facility Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 14.00 Simple ACUITE A2+ | Assigned
Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.
­

Contacts

List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments

© Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved.www.acuite.in