Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating
Bank Loan Ratings 10.75 ACUITE BB | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn -
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) 0.00 - -
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) 10.75 - -
 
Rating Rationale
­Acuité has reaffirmed and withdrawn the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BB’ (read as ACUITE double B) on the Rs.10.75 Cr. bank facilities of R D Weld Products Private Limited. The rating is being withdrawn on account of the request received from the company and the NOC received from the banker as per Acuité’s policy on withdrawal of ratings.

About the Company
­Incorporated in 1997, R.D Weld Products Private Limited (RDWPPL) is engaged in trading of welding consumables, welding equipment, welding & cutting accessories. The company is promoted by Mr. Manoj Balwani and family. The company trades about 70 per cent of Hyundai Welding Co. Limited. products and has exclusive dealership of these products.The company is currently Located in Mumbai.Directors of R D WELD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED are Mr Manoj Radhakishan Balwani, Mr Akshay Manoj Balwani and Ms Rashmi Manoj Balwani.
 
Analytical Approach
­Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of RDWPPL to arrive at the rating.
 

Key Rating Drivers

Strengths
­>Extensive experience of promoters in in the welding consumables industry
The company has a long track record of over past two decades in the trading business. The key promoter of the company, Mr. Manoj Balwani, has been associated with similar line of business since past two decades. The extensive experience of the promoter supported by experience has enabled the firm to forge healthy relationships with customers for repeated business. The established vintage supported the company in expanding the supplier base over the years to cover the industry majors like Hyundai Welding Co.Ltd, D & H Sechron Electrodes Pvt.Ltd, Shenzhen Jasic Technology Co.Ltd, Changzhou Aozhong Special Welding Wire Co. Ltd among others. Acuité believes that RDWPPL's longstanding presence and relationship with reputed suppliers are expected to support in improving the business risk profile over the medium term.

>Moderate financial Risk Profile
The financial risk profile of the company stood moderate marked by modest net worth, low gearing, and comfortable debt protection metrics. The tangible net worth stood at Rs.9.02 crore as on 31 March 2022 as against Rs.8.39 crore as on 31 March, 2021 and Rs.8.08 crore as on 31 March, 2020. The total debt of the company stood at Rs.8.78 crore includes Rs.2.29 crore of long-term debt, Rs.2.59 crore of short-term debt, Rs.0.74 crore of unsecured loans and Rs.3.15 crore of CPLTD as on 31 March, 2022. The gearing (debt-equity) stood at 0.97 times as on 31 March 2022 as compared to 1.25 times as on 31 March, 2021 and 0.75 times as on 31 March, 2020. Interest Coverage Ratio stood at 1.54 times for FY2022 as against 1.53 times for FY2021 and 1.43 times for FY2020. Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) stood at 0.56 times in FY2022 as against 1.35 times in FY2021 and 1.33 times in FY2020. Total outside Liabilities/Total Net Worth (TOL/TNW) stood at 2.73 times as on 31 March, 2022 as against 2.81 times as on 31 March, 2021 as against 2.86 times as on 31 March, 2020. Net Cash Accruals to Total Debt (NCA/TD) stood at 0.11 times for FY2022.
Weaknesses
­> Intensive Working capital management
The working capital management of the company is intensive though improved substantially marked by GCA days of 172 days in FY2022 as against 272 days in FY2021 and 210 days in FY2020. The debtor days stood at 72 days in FY2022 as against 101 days in FY2021. The average credit period allowed to customers is around 80-90 days. However, the creditor days stood at 113 days in FY2022 as against 163 days in FY2021. The average credit period allowed by suppliers is around 90-120 days. Also, the inventory days stood at 106 days in FY2022 as against 144 days in FY2021.
Acuité believes that with the nature of the product and business operations, the operations continue to be working capital intensive over the medium term.

>Intense competition in fragmented industry
The welding consumables industry is highly fragmented due to the presence of a large number of organised and unorganised players. Dealers generally faces a stiff competition from the other dealers in the market. Due to high competitive nature of industry, profitability margins are thin. Acuité believes that RDWPPL’s scale will improve over the medium term with improving demand


 
Rating Sensitivities
­>Ability of the company to improve its scale of operations without deteriorating its operating margins.
>Improvement in capital structure.
 
Material covenants
­None
 
Liquidity Position
Stretched
­The company’s liquidity profile is stretched marked by low net cash accruals of Rs.0.99 Cr in FY2022 against its maturing debt obligation of Rs.3.15 Cr in the same period. The firm maintains unencumbered cash and bank balances of Rs.0.06 crore as on March 31, 2022. The current ratio of the company stood moderate at 1.28 times as on March 31, 2022 as against 1.44 times as on March 31, 2021.
 
Outlook: ­Not Applicable
­
 
Other Factors affecting Rating
­None
 

Particulars Unit FY 22 (Actual) FY 21 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 54.42 32.92
PAT Rs. Cr. 0.62 0.35
PAT Margin (%) 1.13 1.05
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 0.97 1.25
PBDIT/Interest Times 1.54 1.53
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable)
­None
 
Any other information
­None
 
Applicable Criteria
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm

Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument
­In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.
 

Date Name of Instruments/Facilities Term Amount (Rs. Cr) Rating/Outlook
22 Jul 2022 Term Loan Long Term 1.05 ACUITE BB | Stable (Reaffirmed)
Cash Credit Long Term 9.70 ACUITE BB | Stable (Reaffirmed)
26 Apr 2021 Cash Credit Long Term 9.70 ACUITE BB | Stable (Reaffirmed)
Term Loan Long Term 1.05 ACUITE BB | Stable (Reaffirmed)
­

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum (Rs. Cr.) Complexity Level Rating
Bank of Maharashtra Not Applicable Cash Credit Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 9.70 Simple ACUITE BB | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn
Bank of Maharashtra Not Applicable Term Loan Not available Not available Not available 1.05 Simple ACUITE BB | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn

Contacts
Analytical Rating Desk
About Acuité Ratings & Research

Acuité Ratings & Research Limitedwww.acuite.in