|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 26.75 | ACUITE C | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 43.25 | - | ACUITE A4 | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 70.00 | - | - |
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 0.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuite has downgraded the long term rating to ACUITE C (read as Acuite C) from ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and short term rating to ACUITE A4 (Acuite A four) from ‘ACUITE A3 (read as ACUITE A three)’ on the Rs.70.00 crore bank facilities of RPL Projects Limited. (RPLPL) The rating has been downgraded on account of information risk and Default information available in public domain. This rating is now an indicative rating, based on the best available information.
Rationale for Rating Action The rating action is based on the availbale public infiormation stating default in long term loan account of company |
About the Company |
Varanasi based, RPL Projects Limited (RPLPL) was incorporated in the year 2009 and is engaged in removal of overburden from coal mines, logistics of fine coal and trading of coal across the country. RPLPL executes contracts for reputed companies like Western Coalfields Limited, Ultratech Cement Limited and Grasim Industries Limited, to name a few. Currently, the directors of the company are Mr. Naveen Rungta, Mr. Praveen Kumar Rungta, Mr. Santosh Kumar Rungta and Mr. Mahendra Kumar Rungta.
|
Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower |
Acuité has been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer / borrower failed to submit such information before due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and non - cooperation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is therefore being flagged as “Issuer not-cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies.
|
Limitation regarding information availability |
The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité endeavored to gather information about the entity/industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based.
|
Rating Sensitivities |
No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon. |
Material Covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position |
No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon. |
Outlook |
Not Applicable |
Particulars | Unit | FY 21 (Provisional) | FY 20 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 146.15 | 167.86 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 4.02 | 4.73 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 2.75 | 2.82 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 1.00 | 1.41 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 4.74 | 4.01 |
Key Financials: |
The rated entity has not shared the latest financial statements despite repeated requests. |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA |
ICRA vide its Press Release dated July 14,2022, reaffirmed RPLPL to ICRA B/A4; INC Brickworks vide its Press Release dated March31,2022, Downgraded & Reaffirmed RPLPL to BWR B+/A4; INC |
Any other information |
Acuité is yet to receive the latest No Default Statement (NDS) from the rated entity, despite repeated requests and follow-ups |
Applicable Criteria |
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm |
Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |