|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 20.00 | ACUITE BB- | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn | Issuer not co-operating* | - |
| Total Outstanding | 0.00 | - | - |
| Total Withdrawn | 20.00 | - | - |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuité has reaffirmed and withdrawn the long-term rating to ‘ACUITE BB-’ (read as ACUITE Double B minus) on Rs.20.00 crore bank facilities of Riverstone Jewels LLP. The rating continues to be flagged as “Issuer Not Cooperating” and is based on the best available information. |
| About the Company |
|
Mumbai based, Riverstone Jewels LLP (RJLP), established in 2014, manufactures diamond-studded jewellery at Andheri in Mumbai (Maharashtra). The firm is led by Mr. Kailash Shah, Mr. Ruchin Shah, Mr. Saurin Shah and Mr. Tanay Shah. RJLP caters to reputed brands including Titan and Kalyan Jewellers, among others. |
| Unsupported Rating |
|
Not Applicable |
| Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower: |
|
Acuité has been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and non co-operation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is, therefore, being flagged as “Issuer not-cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies. |
| Limitation regarding information availability: |
|
The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité endeavoured to gather information about the entity/ industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based. |
| Rating Sensitivity |
|
"No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon." |
| Liquidity Position |
|
"No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon." |
| Outlook: Not Applicable |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 23 (Actual) | FY 22 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 519.84 | 319.33 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 9.30 | 5.12 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 1.79 | 1.60 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 1.56 | 3.34 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 4.38 | 3.48 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA |
|
Not Applicable |
| Any other information |
| None |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
| Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in. |
|
| |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
Contacts |
|
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
