Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating
Bank Loan Ratings 95.00 ACUITE B- | Reaffirmed | Issuer not co-operating* -
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) 95.00 - -
 
Rating Rationale

­Acuité has reaffirmed the long term rating of ‘ACUITE B-’ (read as ACUITE B Minus) on the Rs.95.00 crore bank facilities of Riddhi Siddhi Constructions. The rating continues to be flagged as “Issuer Not Cooperating” and is based on the best available information.


About the Company

­Riddhi Siddhi Construction (RSC) is a partnership firm based in Mumbai and established in the year 2004 by Mr. Bishan Mittal, Mr. Mahendra Mittal, Mr. Mahesh Khairari and Mr. Manish Roopchandani. RSC is part of the Ashapura & Options group (A&O). The firm was established as a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for undertaking slum rehabilitation. It is currently developing a slum rehabilitation scheme in Malad (F Residencies). The firm has also tied up with F TV for branding of its projects. The project consists of 2 sale buildings, 3 rehab residential buildings, 1 school rehab building and 1 commercial rehab building.

 
About the Group

­The group is promoted by Chetan Bhanushali and Mr. Praveen Girish Chamaria, who have over two decades of experience in real estate development. The group came into existence in 2008-09 as Ashapura Developers and Options Developers came together with the purpose of providing affordable housing to masses vide undertaking different SRA & Re-development projects. Hereinafter referred to as A&O group. A&O group has completed 31 commercial and residential projects together as well on a standalone basis with ~55 lakh square feet area sold.

 
Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower:

­­Acuité has been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and non-cooperation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is, therefore, being flagged as “Issuer not-cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies.

 
Limitation regarding information availability:

­The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer / borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer / borrower). Acuité endeavored to gather information about the entity / industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based.

 
Rating Sensitivity

"­No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon."

 
All Covenants

­Not Applicable

 
Liquidity Position

­"­No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon."

 
Outlook

­­Not Applicable

 
Other Factors affecting Rating

­­Not Applicable

 

Particulars Unit FY 21 (Provisional) FY 20 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 82.59 100.54
PAT Rs. Cr. 1.49 1.93
PAT Margin (%) 1.80 1.92
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 0.92 1.27
PBDIT/Interest Times 0.00 0.00
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA

­None

 
Any other information

­Acuité is yet to receive the latest No Default Statement (NDS) from the rated entity, despite repeated requests and follow-ups.

 
Applicable Criteria
• Service Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-50.htm
• Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm

Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument

­In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.

 

Date Name of Instruments/Facilities Term Amount (Rs. Cr) Rating/Outlook
08 Aug 2022 Proposed Term Loan Long Term 45.00 ACUITE B- (Downgraded and Issuer not co-operating*)
Term Loan Long Term 50.00 ACUITE B- (Downgraded and Issuer not co-operating*)
25 Aug 2021 Term Loan Long Term 50.00 ACUITE B | Stable (Reaffirmed)
Proposed Term Loan Long Term 45.00 ACUITE B | Stable (Reaffirmed)
28 May 2020 Proposed Term Loan Long Term 45.00 ACUITE B | Stable (Assigned)
Term Loan Long Term 50.00 ACUITE B | Stable (Assigned)
­

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum (Rs. Cr.) Complexity Level Rating
Not Applicable Not Applicable Proposed Long Term Loan Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 45.00 Simple ACUITE B- | Reaffirmed | Issuer not co-operating*
Bank of Baroda Not Applicable Term Loan Not available Not available Not available 50.00 Simple ACUITE B- | Reaffirmed | Issuer not co-operating*

Contacts




About Acuité Ratings & Research

Acuité Ratings & Research Limitedwww.acuite.in