|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 910.00 | ACUITE BB | Stable | Reaffirmed | Negative to Stable | - |
Non Convertible Debentures (NCD) | 1350.00 | Provisional | ACUITE BB | Stable | Assigned | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 250.00 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 2510.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed its long-term rating to 'ACUITE BB' (read as ACUITE double B) and the short-term rating to 'ACUITE A4+' (read as ACUITE A four plus) on the Rs. 1,160.00 crore bank facilities of RattanIndia Power Limited (RPL). The outlook is revised to 'Stable' from ‘Negative’. |
About the Company |
RPL was incorporated in the year 2007 as Sophia Power Company Limited, originally as a part of Indiabulls group. The company changed its name to Indiabulls Power Limited after its listing on NSE as well as BSE in the year 2009. In 2014, subsequent to the group split along with Indiabulls Infrastructure and Power Limited, the company was carved out and renamed as RattanIndia Power Limited. RPL is promoted by Mr. Rajiv Rattan who is one of the co-founders of Indiabulls Group and currently holds the Chairmanship of RattanIndia Group. The company operates Amravati Thermal Power Project, located at Amravati district, Maharashtra with a total power generation capacity of 2,700 MW comprising of two phases of 1,350 MW each. Phase-I of the power plant (270 MW x 5 units) was commissioned in March 2015. Phase-II is at present stalled due to pertaining uncertainties associated with Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). However, it would be treated as separate account owing to the presence of ring-fenced mechanism prescribed by the lenders for the said project. |
Analytical Approach |
Acuité has considered the standalone view of business and financial risk profiles of RPL to arrive at this rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Improvement in the operating performance |
Weaknesses |
Delay in resolving long-pending change in law claims |
ESG Factors Relevant for Rating |
RPL is a power producer based on thermal electricity. The advancing environmental risk emanating from new regulations may adversely impact the cost of generation. Environmental risk is a major issue for thermal power generators as coal based power generation causes significant environmental damage. While there have been some measures adopted to reduce the carbon emission, the reduction however is not uniform. The risks of regulatory constraints therefore continue to remain high for this industry and additional measures could lead to cost escalation. |
Rating Sensitivities |
> Recovery of claims within expected tenure |
Material covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position |
Stretched |
The liquidity position of the company is stretched marked by tightly matching net cash accruals against the repayment obligations. RPL generated net cash accruals of Rs. 574 crore in FY2022 as against repayment obligations of Rs. 501.86 crore. Further the company was able to prepay its loan of Rs.254.73 crore during FY2023. Going ahead, the estimated net cash accruals are expected to be in the range of Rs.822.48 -905.15 crore per annum during the period FY2023-2025 and the repayment obligation post the refinancing including redemption of preference shares are expected to be in the range of Rs. 472-722.01 crore during same period. The company has also received claims worth Rs. 114 crore in Q4FY2023. However, timely refinancing of debt still remains critical to avert further pressure on company’s liquidity position. |
Outlook: Stable |
Acuite believes that RPL will maintain a ‘stable’ outlook on account of stable operating performance and will continue to derive benefits over the medium term due to extensive experience, presence of long-term PPA for entire capacity and low fuel supply risk. The outlook may be revised to ‘Positive’ in case the company registers higher-than-expected improvement in its business risk profile and financial risk profile. Conversely, the outlook may be revised to ‘Negative’ in case of deterioration in the company’s financial risk profile or delay in realisation of receivables or refinancing of debt. |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 3259.52 | 1559.86 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 348.14 | 96.70 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 10.68 | 6.20 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.84 | 1.01 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.98 | 1.49 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
Brickworks vide its press release dated 29/12/2022, had denoted the company to BWR D/D; Issuer Not Cooperating. |
Any other information |
Supplementary disclosures for Provisional Ratings
A. Risks associated with the provisional nature of the credit rating 1. Lack of third party monitoring of compliance in absence of executed trust deed and no finalized terms in absence of final term sheet 2. In case there are material changes in the terms of the transaction after the initial assignment of the provisional rating and post the completion of the issuance (corresponding to the part that has been issued) Acuite will withdraw the existing provisional rating and concurrently, assign a fresh final rating in the same press release, basis the revised terms of the transaction. B. Rating that would have been assigned in absence of the pending steps/ documentation The rating would be equated to the standalone rating of the entity: ACUITE B / Stable Acuité Ratings & Research Limited C. Timeline for conversion to Final Rating for a debt instrument proposed to be issued The provisional rating shall be converted into a final rating within 90 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. Under no circumstance shall the provisional rating continue upon the expiry of 180 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Entities In Manufacturing Sector:- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in. |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |