| Experienced Management
RICPL has been present in the construction and infrastructure industry for over four decades which has enabled the company to establish strong relations with its customers as well as with suppliers and also have a strong market position. The company is promoted by Mr. Ram Niwas Gupta who has been associated with the company since its association, which indicating an experience of more than four decades. Acuité believes that the company will continue to derive benefit from its promoter’s experience, and established relations with its customers and suppliers.
Moderate Financial Risk Profile
The company’s financial risk profile is moderate, supported by improving net worth, low gearing, and comfortable debt protection metrics. Tangible net worth rose to Rs.244.88 crore in FY2025 from Rs.228.09 crore in FY2024 due to accretion to reserves, while gearing remained below unity at 0.14 times in FY 25. Total borrowings stood at Rs.34.61 crore in FY2025, comprising long-term debt of Rs.13.74 crore, short-term debt of Rs.2.57 crore, and CPLTD of Rs.18.30 crore. Long-term borrowing and CPLTD are mainly on account of working capital demand loans (mobilization advances) secured against bank guarantees with tenures of 23– 37 months. Debt protection metrics were stable, with ICR at 4.93 times and DSCR at 1.34 times in FY 25 comparative figures to be provided; TOL/TNW and Debt/EBITDA stood at 0.95 and 0.99 times, respectively in FY 25. Acuité believes the financial risk profile to remain in line with FY2025 levels.
|
| Decline in Scale of operation with stable profitability:
RICPL’s revenue fell sharply to Rs.432.20 crore in FY25 from Rs.1,035.03 crore in FY24 due to execution delays, mainly caused by site clearance issues and funding constraints from govt. authorities, with a major impact from the Rs.783.54 crore Central Public Works Department (CPWD) Sriniwaspuri project stalled over site clearance. Despite this, the company achieved Rs.350 crore revenue in 9MFY26 and holds an outstanding order book of Rs.3,684.85 crore as of Nov’25, including fresh orders worth Rs.1,182 crore in FY26, providing moderate revenue visibility. However, execution risks remain, with potential delays or any foreclosures leading to cost overruns and thus liquidity strain. EBITDA margin stayed stable at 5.83% in FY25 versus 5.82% in FY24, while PAT declined to 3.89% in FY 25 from 4.51% in FY 24 due to higher finance costs. Acuité believes operating performance to improve in the medium term, backed by its outstanding order book and stable profitability.
Intensive Working Capital Management:
RCIPL’s working capital intensity remained high in FY 2025 with GCA days increasing to 236 days from 93days in FY 2024, primarily due to elongated inventory and debtor cycles and high current assets. Debtor days rose to 26 days in FY 2025 from 12 days in FY 2024 which is in line with the company’s policy of receiving payments within 30 days post-invoicing. Inventory days surged to 84 days in FY 25 from 15 days in FY 24, mainly due to WIP. Creditor days increased to 223 days in FY 25 from 134 days in FY 24, indicating stretched payments. Other current assets stood at Rs.126.48 crore in FY 2025 (retention money, advances, security deposits, and balances with revenue authorities. Retention money generally constitutes 2.5% of the project value which realised once the DLP periods get over DLP generally lies between 24 to 36 months. Acuité believes working capital intensity will persist given the nature of operations.
Ongoing Litigation-National Building Construction Corporation(India) Limited, (NBCC):
As per management, RICPL has pending 15 no. of cases ongoing with NBCC Ltd. As of 31-10- 2025, as per management, total amount payable to RICPL by NBCC Ltd is approx. Rs. 691 crores which are under legal proceeding out of which majorly portionis pertaining to Greenview project, Crystal Home and Enchante home (Amrapali Project), ESIC Hospital Project-DHC among others. Presently, the legal proceedings are pending under the Delhi High Court and any adverse decision favouring NBCCLtd, can impact the credit profile of the company. This potential consequence will remain a significant rating sensitivity factor over the medium term.
|