|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 50.00 | ACUITE A- | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
Total Outstanding | 50.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed its long-term rating of ‘ACUITE A-’ (read as ACUITE A minus) on the Rs. 50.00 crore bank facilities of Raj Infra NSK 60 LLP (RINSK). The outlook is ‘Stable’. The rating reaffirmation takes into the account that the project is already completed along with all the milestone payments received from PWD (five annuity payments have been received by the company). The firm maintains adequate liquidity along with DSRA equivalent to half yearly instalment and six months interest and escrow mechanism. Further, it is also supported by the sponsor – Raj Infrastructure Developments India Private Limited, in the form of corporate guarantees for the loan availed while arriving at the rating. The ratings are constrained by the entity’s profitability and the cashflows being exposed to the risk related to delay in annuity payments and changes in operational and interest cost. |
About the Company |
The entity is an SPV sponsored by Raj Infrastructure Developments (India) Private Limited (RIDIPL). Raj Infra NSK 60 LLP was formed in 2018, for the construction of road in Dhule district in the state of Maharashtra and is Pune based entity. It’s core business focuses on highway construction, irrigation projects, land development, industrial & residential construction, public private projects. Designated Partners of Raj Infra NSK 60 LLP are Mr. Adhiraj Ram Nimbalkar and Mr. Ram Udaysing Nimbalkar. |
Unsupported Rating |
Not Applicable |
Analytical Approach |
For arriving at the rating, Acuité has considered the standalone credit profile of RINSK, which is strengthened by the managerial support from the sponsor –RIDIPL. Further, Acuité has also considered DSRA equivalent to 1HY instalment and six months interest and escrow mechanism, as specified in the loan sanction letter while arriving at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers |
Strengths |
Benefits derived from the annuity-based revenue model |
Weaknesses |
Susceptibility to risks related to delay in receipt of annuity and changes in operational cost & interest rate |
Rating Sensitivities |
|
Liquidity Position |
Adequate |
RINSK’s liquidity position is adequate marked by timely milestone payment received from PWD, while executing the Back to top 11 project and the company has started receiving annuity payments from April 2022. The project was completed as per schedule time. Besides, the firm has pre-paid its loan to the extent of Rs.1.25 cr. Acuité expects the liquidity of RINSK is likely to remain adequate backed by consistent support from government in terms of annuity payments and also DSRA maintained by the company equivalent to 1HY instalment and six months of interest. |
Outlook: Stable |
Acuité believes that the outlook on RINSK’s rated facilities will remain ‘Stable’ over the medium term on account of steady flow of semi-annual annuity from the government coupled with strong support of sponsors. |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None
|
Particulars | Unit | FY 24 (Provisional) | FY 23 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 7.12 | 2.55 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 2.04 | 0.01 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 28.65 | 0.43 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 1.30 | 1.49 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.44 | 1.00 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
Not Applicable |
Any other information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Service Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-50.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Contacts |
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
© Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved. | www.acuite.in |