Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating Regulated By
Bank Loan Ratings 0.00 195.00 ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Assigned - RBI
Bank Loan Ratings 0.00 35.00 - ACUITE A3 | Assigned RBI
Total Outstanding 0.00 230.00 - - -
Total Withdrawn 0.00 0.00 - - -
Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.
 
Rating Rationale

­Acuite has assigned its long-term rating to ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and its short term ratings to 'ACUITE A3' (read as ACUITE A three) on Rs. 230.00 Cr. bank facilities of Quippo Oil and Gas Infrastructure Limited (Quippo). The outlook is 'Stable'.

Rationale for Rating
The assigned ratings factor in the company’s experienced management team, with over a decade of track record in the same line of business and its healthy unexecuted order book of over Rs. 1,200 crore with strong & reputed  clientele which provides revenue visibility over the next three to four financial years.

Acuite notes that the company’s historical profile involves financial stress during the pandemic period and involves multiple restructuring, along with a complete change in ownership in 2025. In July 2025, the company witnessed a complete change in ownership, wherein Divinus Alternative Investment Fund (AIF), through its step-down subsidiary Vyom Hydrocarbon Private Limited (VHPL), acquired 100% of the company’s equity from SRIE Multiple Asset Investment Trust – Vision India Fund (SMAIT-VIF) pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 24 July 2025. Notwithstanding these challenges, the company entered into a Master Restructuring cum Settlement Agreement (MRSA) on 6 August 2025 for a total consideration of Rs. 223 crore, with a defined repayment schedule extending up to December 2028.

The ratings also derive comfort from the company’s improving profitability on a year-on-year basis, its moderate financial risk profile, and an adequate liquidity position.

However, the rating strengths are partly offset by volatility in the scale of operations and an intensive working capital requirement, as reflected in a relatively gross current assets (GCA) of 225 days in FY 26 and tender based nature of operations.


About the Company

Quippo Oil and Gas Infrastructure Limited (Quippo), incorporated in 2005, is an India-based oil and gas services provider headquartered in Gurugram. The company is engaged in the deployment of onshore drilling and workover rigs for upstream operators. Quippo’s rigs are owned by third parties and are taken on long-term lease arrangements for deployment across client locations. As on date, the company operates a fleet comprising 12 onshore drilling rigs, 2 workover rigs, and 1 set of seismic equipment. The equipment is deployed with reputed customers primarily across Assam, Rajasthan, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh. The company is managed under the guidance of its independent Board of Directors comprising Mr. Sutanu Behuria, Ms. Sujata Garg, Mr. Avtar Singh Monga and Mr. Uttam Jhunjhunwala.

 
Unsupported Rating
­Not Applicable
 
Analytical Approach
­Acuite has considered standalone business & financial risk profile of Quippo Oil and Gas Infrastructure Limited to arrive at the rating.
 
Key Rating Drivers

Strengths
­Change in Ownership
The company is presently managed by Divinus Fund, a Category II Alternate Investment Fund (AIF) registered under the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012. The fund operates through its trustee, Mitcon Credentia Trusteeship Services Limited, and is represented by its investment manager, Midas Alternative Investment Manager Private Limited (Midas). The fund has demonstrated capability in structuring investment opportunities and driving business growth through a disciplined approach to financial stewardship and operational improvements. Acuité believes that this transition in ownership is likely to strengthen strategic direction and governance, enabling more prudent capital allocation, sharper execution focus, and better long-term decision-making for sustained business stability and growth.

Improvement in profitability margins albeit decline in scale of operations
The company reported net revenue of Rs. 341.83 crore in FY 26 compared to Rs. 396.79 crore in FY25, reflecting a decline of around 13%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the timing gap between completion of existing contracts and redeployment of rigs to new contracts or locations. The operating profit (EBITDA) improved to Rs. 71.23 Cr. in FY 26 against Rs. 35.40 Cr. in FY 25 and Rs. 7.53 Cr. in FY 24. Accordingly, EBITDA margin improved to 20.84% in FY 26 against 8.92% in FY 25 and 2.57% in FY 24. The EBITDA margins in rigs business are volatile because costs are relatively fixed, but revenues depend on rig utilization over the year, pricing, and contract dynamics, leading to uneven profitability year-to-year. Accordingly, the net profit rose to Rs. 11.61 Cr. in FY 26 against Rs. 6.05 Cr. in FY 25 and Rs. (13.74) Cr. in FY 24. Furthermore, till July 2026 (4M FY 27), the company booked net revenue of Rs. 105.99 Cr. with EBITDA of Rs. 28.74 cr. (27.12%) and PBT of Rs. 6.05 Cr. (5.70%). 

Acuite expects the company's revenue and profitability to remain inherently volatile over the medium term, given the nature of the rig-leasing business, where earnings are largely dependent on rig utilization levels, contract renewals and redeployment timelines. Nevertheless, the company's established presence in the oil and gas services sector, healthy operating profitability, and ongoing deployment of rigs with reputed counterparties which is expected to support its business risk profile. Further, the company's ability to secure new contracts and improve fleet utilization levels will remain key monitorable.

Moderate Financial Risk Profile
The financial risk profile of the company is moderate marked by comfortable net worth and moderate gearing level. The tangible net worth of the company improved to Rs. 170.73 Cr. in FY 26 against Rs. 158.79 Cr. in FY 25. The improvement is mainly due to accretion of profits into reserves. The gearing ratio deteriorated at 1.19 times in FY26 compared to 0.47 times in FY25. This increase is primarily attributable to the execution of the Master Settlement and Restructuring Agreement (MSRA) in August 2025 which also includes the lease liabilities as well as acquisition cost for the 8 rigs. Accordingly, TOL/TNW deteriorated to 1.79 times in FY 26 against 0.94 times in FY 25. Debt/EBITDA stood at 2.76 times for FY 26. Acuite believes that financial risk profile of the company will improve in near to medium term on the account of no debt funded capex planned and timely servicing of the debt obligations as per MRSA.

Weaknesses
Intensive Working Capital Operations
The company’s working capital operations are intensive, as reflected in GCA days of 225 days in FY26. This is primarily driven by high inventory holding of 109 days and other current assets, including unbilled revenue. Elevated inventory levels are inherent to the rig leasing business, as the company is required to maintain adequate stock of spares, fuel, and consumables once rigs are deployed. However, the company benefits from relatively timely realization of receivables, with collections typically within 30 days from lessees. Accordingly, debtor days remained low at 25 in FY26, supporting the overall working capital cycle. Acuite believes that the company’s working capital cycle will continue to remain intensive, given the inherent nature of its operations.

­Tender-Based Industry
The company operates in a highly competitive industry, wherein revenue visibility is closely linked to its ability to secure contracts through a tender-based bidding process. The tendering environment is competitive, with bids often awarded on the basis of the lowest quoted price, which exposes the company to margin pressures. The dependence on securing new contracts through competitive bidding also adds uncertainty to future revenue flows. Acuité believes that the tender-based nature of the business will continue to expose the company to competitive risks.

Rating Sensitivities

Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action:
  • ­Improvement in the scale of operations by around 30%, supported by sustained profitability margins.
  • Improvement in financial risk profile
Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action:
  • ­Delay or failure in timely refinancing of outstanding debt
  • Decline in operating profitability margins by 3-4%, which may weaken the cash accruals  
Liquidity Position
Adequate
The company’s liquidity position remains adequate in the near term, supported by sufficient net cash accrual of Rs. 58.85 crore for FY 26 against Rs. 5.85 Cr. of obligation as per the Master Settlement and Restructuring Agreement (MSRA) for the same period. However, going forward, the company is required to meet substantial obligations aggregating to Rs. 157.78 crore during FY28 and FY29 as per the agreement. These repayments are expected to be met through the refinancing of debt with longer repayment tenure and further infusion of funds into the company. The current ratio stood at 1.66 times in FY 26, with cash and bank balances of Rs. 5.29 crore as on March 31, 2026. Acuite believes that timely refinancing of the outstanding debt will help to improve the company’s liquidity position over the medium term.
 
Outlook: Stable
­
 
Other Factors affecting Rating
­None.
 

Particulars Unit FY 26 (Actual) FY 25 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 341.83 396.79
PAT Rs. Cr. 11.61 6.05
PAT Margin (%) 3.40 1.53
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 1.19 0.47
PBDIT/Interest Times 5.60 39.48
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable)
None
 
Any other information
­None
 
Applicable Criteria
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument


Rating History :
­Not Applicable
 

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Listing Status Regulated By Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum
(Rs. Cr.)
Complexity Level Rating
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Bank Guarantee Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 35.00 Simple ACUITE A3 | Assigned
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Long Term Loan Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 165.00 Simple ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Assigned
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Secured Working Capital Bank Facility Unlisted RBI Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 30.00 Simple ACUITE BBB- | Stable | Assigned
Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.

Contacts

List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments

© Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved.www.acuite.in