|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 66.32 | ACUITE BBB | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 61.60 | - | ACUITE A3+ | Reaffirmed |
| Total Outstanding | 127.92 | - | - |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuite has reaffirmed the long-term rating to ‘ACUITE BBB ‘(read as ACUITE triple B) and the short-term rating to ‘ACUITE A3+ ‘(read as ACUITE A three plus) on Rs. 127.92 Cr. bank facilities rating of Premier Irrigation Adritech Private Limited. The outlook remains ‘stable’.
Rational For Rating The rating factors in the improving scale of operations and margins and moderate financial risk profile of the company marked by low gearing and comfortable debt protection metrics. The rating also draws comfort from the longstanding operations of the company, extensive experience of the promoters in the agricultural sector and favourable outlook for micro irrigation system. The adequate liquidity position of the company, is reflected in comfortable current ratio and moderate bank-based limit utilization, also supports the rating. However, these strengths are partially offset by susceptibility to any change in government policy, volatility in raw material prices and intensive working capital requirement due to larger dependence on subsidy-based business. |
| About the Company |
|
Premier Irrigation Adritech Private Limited (PIAPL) is a leading manufacturer of irrigation equipment in India with over 50 years of experience. They are known for their drip irrigation and sprinkler systems. 'The day-to-day operations of the company are managed by Mr. Shrikant Goenka, Mr. Krishna Kumar Goenka, Mr. Michael John Pook and Mr. Pradipkumar Basak.' PIAPL was formed in 2008 from a joint venture between Premier Irrigation, a pioneer in Indian irrigation and Adritech Group International, a global irrigation company. This joint venture combines expertise in Indian agriculture with global irrigation experience. The registered office of the company is in Kolkata. The manufacturing facility is in Nagpur.
|
| Unsupported Rating |
|
Not Applicable
|
| Analytical Approach |
|
Acuite has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of PIAPL to arrive at the rating.
|
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Long track record of operations and experienced management
The company has a long operational track record of around five decades in the manufacturing of modern irrigation equipment and systems in India. Day to day operations of the company is managed by Mr. Shrikant Goenka and a team of experienced and qualified professionals. Acuité believes that the long operational track record of the company coupled with the extensive experience of the management will continue to benefit the company going forward, resulting in improving scale of operations. Improving scale of operations and improvement in margins PIAPL posted an operating income of Rs. 258.19 Cr in FY23 as against Rs. 240.51Cr in FY22, a yo-y growth of 7%. The company has achieved revenue of Rs. 293.05 Cr in FY24 (Prov.), driven by growth in all its business segments. PIAPL’s operating margin also improved to 9.93 percent in FY24 (Prov.) as against 9.50 per cent in FY2023 and 7.91 per cent in FY2022 because of largely stable raw material prices, increased sales in drip coil product which is more profitable than sprinklers and focus on states which fetches higher margins on their products. The PAT margin also increased slightly to 3.72% in FY24 (Prov.) as against 3.45% in FY2023 and 2.72% in FY2022. The ROCE levels stood comfortable at 20.71% in FY24 (Prov.) as against 18.88% in FY2023 and 16.27% in FY2022. Acuite believes that sustainability of such improvement in operations and margins will remain a key monitorable over the medium term. Moderate Financial Risk Profile The company has a moderate financial risk profile marked by its healthy net worth, low gearing ratio and comfortable debt protection metrics. The net worth of the company stood at Rs. 90.81 Cr. in FY24 (Prov.) as against Rs. 79.91 Cr. In FY23. The gearing remained below unity at 0.47 times in FY24 (Prov.) as against 0.53 times in FY23 and 0.30 times on FY22. TOL/TNW ratio decreased from 1.78 times in FY23 to 1.40 times in FY24 (Prov.). The interest coverage ratio and debt service coverage ratio were 2.71 times and 1.66 times respectively as of March 31, 2024 (Prov.) in line with 2.47 times and 1.52 times respectively as on March 31, 2023. Acuite believes that the company’s financial risk profile will remain at a moderate level backed by comfortable capital structure and debt protection metrices over the medium term. |
| Weaknesses |
| Intensive Working Capital Operations
The operations of the company are working capital intensive as reflected by Gross Current Assets (GCA days) of 241 days in FY24 (Prov.) as against 276 days as on March 31, 2023, and 264 days as on March 31, 2022. The debtor stood at 166 days in FY24 (Prov.) as against 185 days in FY2023 and 186 days in FY22, due to increasing focus on advanced payment-based business (non-subsidy part). For the same, the Company has formed separate Strategic Business Units (SBU), with separate teams for better focus in the non-subsidy-based business to derisk the company from subsidy receivable cycle. Furthermore, there is also an improvement in collection cycle from different states. The inventory days improved to 69 days in FY24 (Prov.) as against 78 days as on March 31, 2023, and 65 days as on March 31, 2022. Against this. the company has high dependence on its suppliers as reflected from creditor days of 175 days in FY24 (Prov.) as against 240 days in FY23 and 236 days in FY22. Acuite believes that while PIAPL would continue to have intensive working capital requirement due to larger dependence on subsidy-based business where its realisable cycle remains high, albeit slight improvement. Susceptibility to volatiliy in raw material prices The company is vulnerable to adverse fluctuations in raw material prices and the inability to completely pass on any increase in price to end users as unit prices are fixed by the government and reviewed periodically. Raw materials (high- and low-density polyethylene) are predominantly crude oil derivatives, and their prices move in line with crude oil rates. |
| Rating Sensitivities |
|
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
The company has an adequate liquidity profile as reflected from net cash accruals of Rs. 13.21 Cr in FY24 (Prov.) as against a long-term debt repayment of Rs. 3.67 Cr over the same period. Current ratio stood comfortable at 1.66 times in FY24 (Prov.) as against 1.53 times in FY23 and 1.63 times in FY22. The GCA days stood comfortable 241 days in FY24 (Prov.) compared to 276 days in FY23. The fund-based limit remained utilised at 59.83 % (Apr 23-Mar 24). The cash and bank balance stood at Rs. 2.78 Cr. in FY24 (Prov.) compared to Rs. 7.75 Cr as on March 31, 2023. Acuite believes the liquidity will continue to remain adequate because of steady cash accruals against small debt repayments, moderate current ratio, absence of any capex plans and moderate bank limit utilisation.
|
| Outlook: Stable |
|
Acuité believes that the outlook on the company will remain 'Stable' over the medium term on account of the long track record of operations, experienced management, improvement in scale of operations and margins and moderate financial risk profile. The outlook may be revised to 'Positive' in case of significant growth in revenues while maintaining operating margins, capital structure and improvement in working capital management. Conversely, the outlook may be revised to ‘Negative’ in case of decline in the company's revenues or profit margins, or in case of deterioration in the company's financial risk profile and liquidity position or further elongation in its working capital cycle.
|
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 23 (Actual) | FY 22 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 258.19 | 240.51 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 8.90 | 6.53 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 3.45 | 2.72 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.53 | 0.30 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 2.47 | 2.18 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
| Not Applicable |
| Any other information |
| None |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.
|
|
| |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
|
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
