|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 11.00 | ACUITE B+ | Reaffirmed | Issuer not co-operating* | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 111.00 | - | ACUITE A4 | Reaffirmed | Issuer not co-operating* |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 122.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE B+ (read as ACUITE B Plus)’ and the short- term rating of ‘ACUITE A4 (read as ACUITE A four)’ on the Rs. 122.00 Cr bank facilities of Pochampad Construction Company Private Limited (PCCPL).
This rating is now an indicative rating and is based on the best available information. |
About the Company |
Pochampad Constructions Company Private Limited (PCCPL) was established in 1992 as a proprietory concern by Mr. Rajendra Rao. The proprietorship was later converted to a Partnership firm in the year 2003 and was subsequently converted to a Private Ltd Company in the year 2004. The promoters have long experience in execution of infrastructure projects as Class-1 contractor. PCCPL is engaged in niche area of undertaking water projects like construction of intake wells, and make up water system, lying of pipes, etc. The firm undertakes contracts from government. Directors of Pochampad Construction Company Private Limited are Ranga Rao Meneni, Rajender Rao Velchala, Rekha Velchala.
|
Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower |
Acuité has been requesting for No Default Statements (NDS); however, despite multiple requests; the Company’s management has remained non-cooperative and not submitted the NDS for the preceding 03 consecutive months. Acuité has also been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and noncooperation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is therefore being flagged as “Issuer not cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies.
|
Limitation regarding information availability |
The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité has endeavoured to gather information about the entity/industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based.
|
Rating Sensitivities |
No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon.
|
All Covenants |
Not Applicable |
Liquidity Position |
No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon.
|
Outlook |
None |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Provisional) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 35.23 | 68.77 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 2.21 | 4.43 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 6.28 | 6.45 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.30 | 0.35 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 2.73 | 3.39 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA |
Not Applicable
|
Any other information |
Acuité is yet to receive the latest No Default Statement (NDS) from the rated entity, despite repeated requests and follow-ups. |
Applicable Criteria |
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Infrastructure Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-51.htm |
Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contacts |
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |