|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 12.50 | ACUITE D | Assigned | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 72.50 | ACUITE D | Downgraded | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 40.00 | - | ACUITE D | Downgraded |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 125.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has downgraded its long-term rating to 'ACUITE D (read as ACUITE D) from ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE Triple B Minus) and the short term rating to 'ACUITE D (read as ACUITE D) from ‘ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three) on the Rs.112.50 crore bank facilities of Novus Green Energy Systems Limited (NGESL). |
About the Company |
Novus Green Energy Systems Limited (NGESL) was incorporated in the year 2009 and is based in Hyderabad, Telangana. |
Analytical Approach |
Acuité has considered the standalone financial and business risk profile of NGESL to arrive at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Experienced Management |
Weaknesses |
Working Capital Intensive operations: The operations of NGESL are working capital intensive evident from the Gross Current Assets (GCA) days of 343 in FY22 which was deteriorated from 299 days recorded in FY2021. The increase in GCA days is mainly because of piling up of the inventory during FY22 due to delay in project executions in Uttar Pradesh and other areas. The inventory days are expected to be reduced to historic levels from FY23. Debtor days improved from 234 days in FY20 to 172 days in FY21 and further improved to 163 days in FY22 and expected to be in the range of 165-170 days for FY23. The bank limits utilization stood around 85.5% for the past 12months period ending ended March 2023. Acuite believes that the scale of operations will remain sensitive because of the nature of the business and high competition from other companies in the industry. |
Rating Sensitivities |
|
Material covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position |
Poor |
The liquidity position of the company is poor on account of recent past instances of delays in servicing of debt obligation. |
Outlook: |
Not applicable |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 165.29 | 119.02 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 1.55 | 0.91 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 0.94 | 0.77 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 3.90 | 2.82 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.47 | 1.49 |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
None |
Any other information |
The client did not submit latest bank statements despite multiple requests. |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Entities In Manufacturing Sector:- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-55.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |