|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 50.10 | ACUITE BB+ | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* | - |
| Total Outstanding | 50.10 | - | - |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuite has downgraded the long-term rating to ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B plus) from 'ACUITE BBB+' (read as ACUITE triple B plus) on the Rs.50.10 crore bank facilities of National Enterprises.
The rating is now flagged as “Issuer Not Cooperating” and is based on the best available information. The downgrade is based on Information risk. |
| About the Company |
|
Established in 1974, National Enterprises (NE) is a proprietorship firm engaged in the mining business. It is headed by the proprietor Shri Charanjit Singh Grewal. The firm operates through three iron ore mines which are Raikela Mine, Sanindpur mine and Adaghat mine in Sundergarh District of Odisha. In addition, the firm has two wind based power generating unit in Rajasthan and Tamilnadu with a capacity of 6 MW and 14.7 MW respectively.
|
| Unsupported Rating |
| Not Applicable |
| Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower |
|
Acuité has been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and non-cooperation by the issuer along with an unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is, therefore, being flagged as “Issuer not-cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies.
|
| Limitation regarding information availability |
|
The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité has endeavoured to gather information about the entity/industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based.
|
| Rating Sensitivities |
|
No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon.
|
| Liquidity Position |
| No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon. |
| Outlook: Not Applicable |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 379.32 | 233.68 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 195.21 | 51.31 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 51.46 | 21.96 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.48 | 3.20 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 7.87 | 1.95 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA |
| Not Applicable |
| Any other information |
| None |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Real Estate Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-63.htm • Service Sector: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-50.htm |
| Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
| |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
Contacts |
|
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
