Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.
Rating Rationale
Acuité has reaffirmed its long-term rating of ‘ACUITE A’ (read as ACUITE A) to the Rs. 550 Cr. bank facilities of MSRDC Infrastructure Projects Limited (MIPL). The outlook is ‘Stable’.
Rationale for the rating The rating reaffirmation factors in the achievement of COD in March 2026 which was revised from June 2025. The final approval and certificates are pending. The rating also takes note of the benefits of the annuity-based revenue model under the HAM framework. The rating also draws comfort from the established track record of MIPL’s parent, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited (MSRDC), in the infrastructure construction segment, along with its strong resource mobilisation ability supported by continued operational and financial support from MSRDC and the Government of Maharashtra. The rating is, however, constrained by the exposure to delays in annuity receipts and variations in O&M costs and interest rates. Timely commencement of project operations post receipt of COD approval and subsequent timely receipt of annuity payments will remain a key rating monitorable.
About the Company
Incorporated in 2016 in Mumbai, MSRDC Infrastructure Projects Limited (MIPL) is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSRDC. It is currently undertaking the six/eight laning of 23.80 km Vadape-Thane section of National Highway – 3 (NH 3) for National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The total project cost is estimated to be Rs. 1229.82 Cr. with SCOD in June 2025. The project has been awarded to MIPL under Hybrid Annuity Method (HAM). The project was awarded to MIPL after NHAI decided to terminate its existing agreement with MEP Long Jian VTR Private Limited – JV of MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MIDL) and Long Jian Road & Bridge Company Limited (LRBCL). MSRDC then agreed to take over the project through MIPL by way of Harmonious Substitution considering the Project’s proximity to MSRDC’s flagship project Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway (NMSCEW) also known as the Samruddhi Mahamarg.
Unsupported Rating
ACUITE BB+/Stable
Analytical Approach
Acuité has considered a standalone approach while assessing the business and financial risk profile of MIPL and has factored in managerial and financial support it receives from MSRDC by virtue of being a wholly owned subsidiary. The rating also factors the strategically important role played by MIPL in implementing a project critical to MSRDC.
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths
Managerial and financial support from MSRDC MSRDC was established by Government of Maharashtra (GoM) in 1996. It is established to oversee large road infrastructure projects across State of Maharashtra. MSRDC has successfully completed key projects such as Mumbai Pune Expressway (MPEW), Bandra Worli Sea Link, Airoli Bridge Project and Satara Kagal Road amongst others. MIPL was formed as MSRDC’s subsidiary to undertake the six/eight laning of 23.80 km Vadape –Thane section of NH-3. Completion of this project is critical to MSRDC as it is in proximity to and will act as a feeder road for its flagship project NMSCEW. MIPL is therefore expected to receive managerial and financial support from MSRDC in completion of this project. MIPL is a fully owned subsidiary and is completely managed by MSDRC. Acuité believes the continued managerial and financial support from MSRDC will remain a critical rating factor.
Substantial project completion and reduced execution risk MIPL is undertaking the six/eight laning of the 23.80 km Vadape-Thane section of National Highway – 3 (NH – 3) under HAM. The project was awarded to MIPL under harmonious substitution after NHAI terminated its agreement with the original concessionaire, MEP Long Jian VTR Private Limited. While the project had earlier witnessed delays primarily on account of land acquisition issues and delays in obtaining requisite permissions/approvals, the execution risk has reduced materially with ~97 per cent of the project cost has been incurred as of June 2026 and PCOD has been declared in March 2026, indicating substantial completion of the project. Further, key approvals such as forest, CRZ and mangrove permissions have been received, while the COD letter is expected in the next 2-3 months. The repayment schedule of debt has been realigned in line with revised COD, with repayments starting from December 2026.Acuité considers the substantial completion of the project, declaration of PCOD and significant progress achieved despite earlier implementation challenges as key credit strengths.
Benefits derived from annuity-based revenue model The project undertaken by MIPL has a Hybrid annuity-based revenue model. Under this model, post completion of construction NHAI will make thirty semi-annual payments to MIPL. MIPL does not bear any traffic risk as it recovers whole of capital cost through these annuity payments. Further, operational and maintenance (O&M) costs and interest costs are also reimbursed by NHAI. Annuity payments have been indexed to inflation thus protecting from any increase in costs and interest costs are reimbursed to the extent of bank rate+3 per cent. MIPL will also provide for a Major Maintenance Reserve (MMR) through its excess cash flow or promoter infusion to cover maintenance costs in excess of the routine O&M expenses. This will be done post commencement of commercial operations. The risk of MIPL to any delay in receipt of annuity payments from NHAI remains low as NHAI is an arm of Government of India (GoI).
Low counter party risk The project is issued and awarded by National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) which is a central government agency strategically important to the Government of India. The company has achieved COD in March 2026 which was revised from June 2025. The final approval and certificates are pending. The project being developed has an annuity-based revenue model. Under this model, the NHAI makes bi-annual payment over the concession period to the concessionaire. The company does not bear any traffic risk as it recovers whole of capital cost through annuity. Further, bi-annual operational and maintenance expense and interest cost reimbursement to the extent of bank rate+ margin per cent is given to the concessionaire during the concession phase. The counter party risk also remains low as the NHAI has a strong financial profile.
Weaknesses
Susceptibility to risks related to delay in receipt of annuity and changes in operational cost & interest rate As per the concession agreement, the company is expected to receive a semi-annual annuity. Any delay in timely receipt of the annuity could adversely impact debt-servicing ability. Along with fixed annuities, the project will receive interest payments on the balance annuities that are linked to the prevailing bank rate. The bank rate has reduced significantly in the past couple of years, which has impacted the project inflow as a large proportion of the cash inflow is from the interest on balance annuities. However, this risk is partially offset as the interest rate on debt is floating and is also expected to follow the trend in bank rates, the company is exposed to risks related to maintenance of the project with DSCR above unity. Further, the company is exposed to risks related to maintenance of the project. If the prescribed standards are not met, annuity payment may be reduced. Any significant delay and deduction in annuities could impact the debt servicing ability of the company. However, strong track record of sponsor, who is also the O&M contractor, is expected to mitigate this risk.
Exposure to risk inherent in toll road projects The project remains exposed to risks Inherent to toll projects. These include political acceptability of toll rate hikes, the latter risk is exacerbated in MIPLs case as the stretch mainly caters to daily commuting passenger vehicles as well as commercial vehicles. The risks also include resistance to pay and likelihood of toll leakages. Further, ability of the company to complete major maintenance within stipulated timelines will remain critical from the credit perspective.
Assessment of Adequacy of Credit Enhancement under various scenarios including stress scenarios (applicable for ratings factoring specified support considerations with or without the “CE” suffix)
Support from GoM
Support from GoM MPRRL, which is the concessionaire, is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSRDC, which in turn is fully owned by the GoM. MSRDC has an extensive experience in the infrastructure industry and has successfully completed several key projects in the state of Maharashtra which provides operational advantage to the company. Further, the GoM has also provided financial assistance in the form of shortfall funding, if any during the operation period and/or the construction period or in case of cost overruns beyond the envisaged total project cost.
Rating Sensitivities
Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action:
Timely receipt of annuities from NHAI on a sustained basis, without material delays, sustaining DSCR above 2.00 times.
Continued support from the parent MSRDC, including timely infusion of funds in case of shortfalls.
Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action:
Prolonged or repeated delays in annuity receipts from NHAI, leading to cash flow mismatches.
Average DSCR falls below 1.50 times
Liquidity Position
Adequate
MIPL’s liquidity is expected to remain adequate over the medium term, supported by the absence of debt repayment obligations until November 2026. The project is yet to commence commercial operations; however, COD is achieved in March 2026. MIPL is entitled to semi-annual annuity payments from NHAI, which will be the primary source for servicing debt obligations. In FY27, the surplus cash flow is expected to be at ~ Rs.50.6 Cr as against the debt obligation of ~Rs. 22 Cr. Further, in FY28, the surplus cash flow is expected to be at ~ Rs. 95 Cr as against the debt obligation of ~Rs.69 Cr. The company is expected to maintain a DSRA of around Rs.40 crores by March 2028 which would provide additional liquidity buffer. Given MIPL’s strategic importance as a subsidiary of Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) and continued support expected from the parent -MSRDC, the liquidity profile is expected to remain comfortable over the medium to long term.
Outlook: Stable
Other Factors affecting Rating
None
Particulars
Unit
FY 25 (Actual)
FY 24 (Actual)
Operating Income
Rs. Cr.
62.86
102.80
PAT
Rs. Cr.
(9.51)
3.68
PAT Margin
(%)
(15.13)
3.58
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth
Times
7.69
90.75
PBDIT/Interest
Times
(0.41)
4.31
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable)
Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available.
*Annexure 2 - List of Entities (applicable for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support)
Sr.No.
Company Name
1
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation - MSRDC
2
MSRDC Infrastructure Projects Limited
Contacts
List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments