![]() |
![]() |
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 65.17 | ACUITE BB+ | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 35.52 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 0.00 | - | - |
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 100.69 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed and withdrawn the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B plus) and short term rating to ‘ACUITE A4+’ (read as ACUITE A four plus) on the Rs.100.69 crore of bank facilities of K A I International Private Limited
The rating has been withdrawn on Acuite's policy of withdrawal of ratings. The rating has been withdrawn on account of the request received from the company, and the NOC received from the banker. Rationale for the reaffirmation The rating reaffirmation takes into account the improvement in the operating income of the company, The rating also draws comfort from the experienced promoter and the company’s long track record in the industry. These strengths are, however, offset by the working capital intensive in nature of operations along with the average financial risk profile. |
About the Company |
Odisha based, K A I International Private Limited (KIPL) was established in the year 2007 by Mr. Suresh Agarwal, Mr. Natwar Kumar Agarwal and Mr. Yashraj Sethia. The company is engaged in trading of iron ore fines, coal and steel products such as sponge iron and billets. The company procures iron ore fines from the mines in Odisha and exported to China, Singapore and United Kingdom. The company also import coal from South Africa and cater to the domestic steel players mainly from eastern part of the county. The company procures steel product domestically and cater to the rolling mills.
|
Analytical Approach |
Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profiles of KIPL to arrive at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Experienced management
KAIIPL benefits from its experienced management. KAIIPL was incorporated in 2000 and its current Directors, Mr. Pravin Kumar Agarwal and Mr. Vijay Shinde Kashinath have around two decades of experience in the hospitality industry. The company primarily owns and operates 2 hotels in Mumbai, 1 resort in Goa and 10 restaurants &food kiosks across India. Acuité believes that the experience of the promoters will continue to support the company’s growth plans going forward. Increase in revenues along with profitability margins. The company’s operating income stood at Rs. 487.81 Cr. as on 31st March 2022 as compared to Rs. 1179.06 Cr. as on 31st March 2021. Further, the operating margin of the company rose to 3.09 per cent as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 2.71 as on 31st March 2021. The PAT margin rose to 1.99 per cent on 31st March 2022 as compared to 1.85 per cent 2021. The RoCE of the company stood at 14.19 per cent as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 39.19 per cent as on 31st March 2021. |
Weaknesses |
Working capital intensive nature of operations
The working capital-intensive nature of operations of the company is marked by high Gross Current Asset days (GCA) of 124 as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 58 days of 31st March 2021 due to significantly changes in high other current asset which consists of other deposit, prepaid expenses material on loans etc. However, the debtor days stood comfortable at 34 days as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 05 days as on 31st March 2021. The inventory period stood relatively low at 35 days as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 09 days 31st March 2021 respectively. Acuité believes that the working capital management of KAIIPL’s will remain intensive given the nature of the industry. Intense competition and inherent cyclical nature of the steel industry The industry remained heavily fragmented and unorganised. The company is exposed to intense competitive pressures from large number of organised and unorganised players along with its exposure to inherent cyclical nature of the steel industry. Additionally, prices of raw materials and products are highly volatile in nature. |
Rating Sensitivities |
None |
Material covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position |
Adequate |
The company’s liquidity position is adequate marked by net cash accruals of Rs.10.29 Cr as on 31st March 2022 as against Rs. 1.06 Cr. long-term debt repayment during the same period. The current ratio stood at 1.10 times as on 31st March 2022, as compared to 1.20 times as on 31st March 2021. The cash and bank balances stood at Rs. 5.35 Cr. 31st March 2022. However, the working capital-intensive nature of operations of the company is marked by Gross Current Assets (GCA) of 124 days as on 31st March 2022 as compared to 58 days as on 31st March 2021, due to high other current asset which signifies FD’s and interest receivables. Acuité believes that going forward the liquidity position of the company will remain adequate due to the improving net cash accruals |
Outlook |
Not Applicable |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 487.81 | 1179.06 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | 9.73 | 21.80 |
PAT Margin | (%) | 1.99 | 1.85 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.31 | 0.35 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | 6.11 | 8.81 |
Status of Non Cooperation with other CRA |
None |
Any other information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm • Trading Entitie: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-61.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |