|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (SEBI) | Quantum (Rs. Cr) (Other FSR) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating | Regulated By |
| BOND | 3278.96 | 0.00 | ACUITE AA+ | CE | Stable | Assigned | Provisional To Final | - | SEBI |
| BOND | 6721.04 | 0.00 | Provisional | ACUITE AA+ | CE | Stable | Reaffirmed | - | SEBI |
| Total Outstanding | 10000.00 | 0.00 | - | - | - |
| Total Withdrawn | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | - | - |
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuite has reaffirmed its long-term rating of 'Provisional ACUITE AA+' (CE) (read as Provisional ACUITE double A plus (Credit Enhancement)) on the Rs.6,721.04 Cr. proposed bonds of Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA). The Outlook is 'Stable'.
The rating on the proposed Rs.6,721.04Cr. bonds is provisional and the final rating is subject to the following documents
Rationale for rating:
The rating assigned to HMDA reflects the unconditional and irrevocable guarantee from the Government of Telangana, backed by a structured escrow framework ensuring priority transfers to the Bond Servicing Account (BSA) and a two-quarter DSRA. HMDA’s diversified revenues from development charges, TOT receipts, land monetization, rentals, and Tellapur inflows provide stability, while substantial land parcels valued at ~Rs.9,550Cr and expected additional land parcel allocations of provides strong future inflow potential. The structured payment mechanism incorporates defined timelines, ensuring early identification and resolution of shortfalls. Rating also factors in liquidity strength drives by maintenance to extent of fully covering the peak service requirement for two quarters. The CE suffix to the rating based on credit enhancement support from GOT's explicit guarantee for the NCDs and replenish the upfront DSRA fully covering peak service requirement of two quarters in case of shortfall/impairment. |
| About the Company |
|
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) was established with the primary objective of planning, coordinating, supervising, promoting, and securing the orderly development of the Hyderabad Metropolitan Region. Formed under an official government order (G.O.Ms.No.570 MA & UD (II) Dept.) on August 25, 2008.. Spanning an extensive area of 7,257 square kilometres, HMDA's jurisdiction encompasses seven districts and 70 mandals. Within this vast region, there are a total of 1,032 villages, including those within the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), which is composed of 175 villages and 40 municipalities, including Nagar Panchayats. Specifically, HMDA is responsible for an additional 138 villages, while the remaining 719 villages also fall under its jurisdiction. This comprehensive coverage allows HMDA to undertake integrated planning and development initiatives aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents and promoting sustainable growth in the metropolitan region. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA) - Established in 1975 and transformed into HMDA. Mr. Anumula Revanth Reddy, Ms. Gadwal Vijayalakshmi, Mr. K. Ramakrishna Rao are the members. |
| Unsupported Rating |
|
Acuite AA-/Stable (factoring in government support) |
| Analytical Approach |
|
Acuite has considered standalone approach financial and business risk profile of HMDA and further notched up for the support of Government of Telangana and structured payment mechanism in place for the issue for arriving at the rating. |
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Strategic importance to Government of Telangana (GoT): |
| Weaknesses |
| Exposure to real estate cyclicality: |
| Assessment of Adequacy of Credit Enhancement under various scenarios including stress scenarios (applicable for ratings factoring specified support considerations with or without the “CE” suffix) |
|
Stress case Scenario |
Rating Sensitivities
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action: |
|
| Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action: |
|
| All Covenants |
|
Structure related covenants:
Financial covenants and security:
All covenants:
Any other document as may be stipulated in the annexure to the key information document. |
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
HMDA’s liquidity is adequate supported by steady inflows from development charges, ORR impact fees, TOT receipts, land monetization and revenues from Tellapur Technocity, which are routed through structured escrow mechanisms to ensure timely debt servicing. The average Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) is expected to be at ~3.42 times throughout the tenure of the bonds. Liquidity comfort is further enhanced by the explicit support from the Government of Telangana, which has undertaken to bridge any shortfall in servicing requirements prior to payout dates under the Guarantee Deed. The authority has unencumbered cash and cash equivalents of ~Rs.3,562Cr as on March 31, 2025 which provides, further liquidity support. |
| Outlook: Stable |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 25 (Actual) | FY 24 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 444.22 | 1193.81 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | (995.20) | (197.53) |
| PAT Margin | (%) | (224.04) | (16.55) |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | (163.29) | 3.15 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
| Not applicable |
| Any other information |
|
Supplementary disclosures for Provisional Ratings A. Risks associated with the provisional nature of the credit rating. 1. Absence of any structured payment mechanism. 2. In case there are material changes in the terms of the transaction after the initial assignment of the provisional rating and post the completion of the issuance (corresponding to the part that has been issued) Acuité will withdraw the existing provisional rating and concurrently, assign a fresh final rating in the same press release, basis the revised terms of the transaction. B. Rating that would have been assigned in absence of the pending steps/ documentation. The rating would be equated to the standalone rating of the entity: ACUITE AA-/ Stable. C.Timeline for conversion to Final Rating for a debt instrument proposed to be issued. The provisional rating shall be converted into a final rating within 90 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. Under no circumstance shall the provisional rating continue upon the expiry of 180 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Group And Parent Support: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-47.htm • Explicit Credit Enhancements: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-49.htm • State Government Ratings : https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-26.htm • Urban Local Bodies : https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-57.htm |
| Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Note:- For activities or ratings of instruments falling under the purview of Financial Sector Regulators other than SEBI, the grievance / dispute redressal mechanisms and investor protection mechanisms provided by SEBI shall not be available. |
*Annexure 2 - List of Entities (applicable for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support) | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Contacts |
List of instruments and names of regulators of the instruments |
| © Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved. | www.acuite.in |
