|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 40.00 | ACUITE BB+ | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* | - |
| Bank Loan Ratings | 54.00 | - | ACUITE A4+ | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* |
| Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 94.00 | - | - |
| Rating Rationale |
|
Acuité has downgraded the long term rating to ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B plus) from ‘ACUITE BBB-’ (read as ACUITE triple B minus) and also downgraded short term rating to ACUITE A4+’ (read as ACUITE A four plus) from ‘ACUITE A3’ (read as ACUITE A three) on the Rs.94.00 crore bank facilities of DTL Ancillaries Limited.
The rating is now flagged as “Issuer NotCooperating” and is based on the best available information. The rating has been downgraded on account of inforamtion risk. |
| About the Company |
|
DTL is a Pune based company incorporated in the year 1996 by Mr. Vijay Mohan Jain, first generation entrepreneur having more than four decades of experience. Mr. Jain is ably supported by his son Mr. Sidharth Jain, in his capacity as a Joint Managing Director. Mr. Darshan Jindal & Mr. Shashank Ramesh Anikhindi both are also director of this company. Mr. Sidharth Jain has been instrumental in scaling up the business operations.DTL is engaged in manufacturing of Cold Roll Formed (CRF) components for Automobile industry, Indian Railways and Metro Railways. DTL manufactures CRF components and fabricates side walls and roofs for wagons/coaches for Indian Railways which accounts for almost 95% of the company’s revenues. DTL also supplies load bodies and panels for commercial vehicles to Piaggio vehicles which accounts to 5% of the revenues.
|
| Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower |
|
Acuité has been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date.Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and noncooperation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is, therefore, being flagged as “Issuer not-cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies. |
| Limitation regarding information availability |
| The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité endeavored to gather information about the entity / industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based. |
| Rating Sensitivities |
| No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon |
| All Covenants |
| None |
| Liquidity Position |
| No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon |
| Outlook: Not Applicable |
| |
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 22 (Actual) | FY 21 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 189.49 | 128.86 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 0.33 | (9.62) |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 0.17 | (7.47) |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.79 | 0.98 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.71 | 0.74 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA |
| None |
| Any other information |
| Acuite is yet to receive the latest No Default Statement from the rated entity despite repeated requests and followups. |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm |
| Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
| |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
|
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
