Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating
Pass Through Certificates (PTCs) 5.87 Provisional | ACUITE BBB- | SO | Assigned -
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) 5.87 - -
 
Rating Rationale
­­­Acuité has assigned a rating of ‘ACUITE PROVISIONAL BBB- (SO)’ (read as ACUITE Provisional triple B minus (Structured Obligation)) to the Series 1 Pass-Through Certificates (PTCs) of Rs. 5.87 Cr. proposed to be issued by PROSPERITY ASSET 5 Trust under a securitisation transaction originated by CONNECT RESIDUARY PRIVATE LIMITED (The Originator/Lessor).

The PTCs are backed by lease receivables from Cherise India Private Limited (lessee/obligor) for assets comprising Tea Vending Machines leased by Connect Residuary Private Limited (lessor).

The rating addresses the timely payment of principal and interest on expected monthly payment dates, however the same are promised on the ultimate final maturity date, in accordance with the transaction documentation. The transaction is structured at par.

The rating is based on the strength of cash flows from lease receivables from the lessee, credit quality of the lessee as well as soundness of the transaction’s legal structure. The credit enhancement is available in the form of:
  1. Cash collateral in the form of fixed deposit issued by the lessor in favor of the trust equivalent to 23.06 percent of the total value of PTCs proposed to be issued.
The rating of the PTCs is provisional and shall be converted to final rating subject to the execution of the following documents:
 
1. Trust Deed
2. Deed of Assignment
3. Servicer Agreement
4. Legal Opinion
5. Final Term Sheet
6. Master Rental Agreement
7. Any other relevant documents to the transaction

About the Originator (Connect Residuary Private Limited)
­­­Connect Residuary Private Limited is Mumbai based company incorporated in 2011. Mr. Ankush Bhan, Mr. Rohit Kakkar are directors of the company. It is engaged in the business of acquiring and dealing in the unguaranteed residuary interest in assets rented to customers. The Company rents assets to customers for a mutually agreed period. Their primary business entails asset renting. As an asset lifecycle management company, they engage with corporates to cater to their asset-based needs for expansion, and offer integrated asset tracking solutions, for clients to manage the rented assets across the organization. They offer varied solutions for their prospective clients like new equipment rental, sale and rent back, refresh plan, short term rentals, and provide value added services like asset disposable services and strategic & advisory services.
 
About the Lessee (Cherise India Private Limited)
­­Incorporated in December 2018, Cherise India Private Limited (CIPL) is based out of Maharashtra and engaged in manufacturing and distribution of tea and coffee premixes and deployment of vending machines under the brand name ‘Cherise’. CIPL is promoted by Mr. Parimal Shah in 2018 who is a tea sommelier and an alumnus of IIM Ahmedabad. The company is also promoted by M K Jokai Agri Plantations private limited, a tea estate based in North east India which manufactures orthodox Assam tea. M K Jokai Agri Plantations private limited is a part of Mr. Parimal Shah’s family business. CIPL generates its revenue through sale of the premixes through two channels i.e. FMCG sales and Vending Machines. Under the FMCG sales, the company currently has a network of 67 distributors through whom it sells its products on online e-commerce websites and physical stores. The company started manufacturing tea and coffee vending machines in 2020. As on date the company has manufactured ~1012 vending machines which have been installed at various corporates, hospitals, Malls, Schools and colleges for free. The company does not earn any income from sale of such vending machines. These vending machines are designed to accept only premixes of Cherise, thus making these vending machines a source for sale at the point of consumption.
 
Assessment of the pool
The receivables are not in the form of a pool. Hence, this section remains not applicable.
 
Credit Enhancements (CE)
­­The credit enhancement is available in the form of:
  1. Cash collateral in the form of fixed deposit issued by the lessor in favor of the trust equivalent to 23.06 percent of the total value of PTCs proposed to be issued.
 
Transaction Structure
­­­The rating addresses the timely payment of principal and interest on expected monthly payment dates, however the same are promised on the final maturity date, in accordance with the transaction documentation. The transaction is structured at par.
 
Assessment of Adequacy of Credit Enhancement
­­­Acuité has considered a default rate as base case to arrive at the expected loss for the receivables being securitised. Acuite has further applied appropriate stress factors to the base figures to arrive at the final estimates and consequently the extent of credit enhancement required. The final estimates also consider the risk profile of the lessee and further factored in economic risks. The PTC payouts will also be supported by credit enhancement in the form of cash collateral (fixed deposit) issued by the lessor in favor of the trust (23.06 percent of the total value of PTCs proposed to be issued).
 
Legal Assessment
The provisional rating is based on a draft term sheet. The conversion of rating from provisional to final, shall include, besides other documents, the legal opinion to the satisfaction of Acuité.
 

Key Risks

Counterparty Risks
­­­The payments to the PTC holders arise from a single obligor. Considering the minimal track record of operations of Cherise India Private Limited, any adverse impact on the overall business risk profile will have a bearing on the servicing ability of the company.
Concentration Risks
­­The rating remains exposed to high concentration risks as the lease receivables i.e cashflow source are from a single obligor.
Servicing Risk
­­­There is limited track record of servicing PTCs, since this one of the initial PTC transactions for the originator and the lessee. Therefore, the servicing risk for the transaction remains high.
Regulatory Risk
­­­In the event of a regulatory stipulation impacting the bankruptcy remoteness of the structure, the payouts to the PTC holders may be impacted.
Prepayment Risk
­The risk remains negligible on account of non-permissibility of prepayment of rentals. In an event of default by the obligor on the lease payments, the Receivables due from the obligor will be discounted at a rate as agreed between the originator and the obligor but will be paid to the Investors at the promised Series 1 Yield.
Commingling Risk
­­While there is a time gap between the expected payout date and the due date for transfer to the payout account, this risk is mitigated by the existence of the trust with a designated escrow account overseen by the trustee. The trust will pass through the rentals to the holders of the PTCs; there will be no involvement/ intervention by the originator in such payments.
Outlook: Not Applicable
­
 
Key Rating sensitivity
  • ­Any upward or downward movement in the overall credit profile of the lessee
  • Timeliness of the lease rental payments by the lessee/obligor
 
All Covenants
­­­The following covenant is included in the transaction structure: The amounts must be deposited in the Collection and Pay-out Account prior to the Expected Pay Out Date. The amounts deposited will be exclusive of GST and TDS deduction (if any), will be in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The amounts drawn upon utilization of the Credit Enhancement, shall be deposited into the Collection and Pay-out Account from which payments to the Beneficiaries shall be made in accordance with the terms of the issue.
 
Liquidity Position
Adequate
­­As per the transaction structure, both the interest and the principal amount is promised to the PTC holders only on the final maturity date of the transaction. Hence, providing adequate liquidity cushion for repayments. Further, the structure has a credit enhancement as a support in the form of cash collateral (fixed deposit) issued by the lessor in favor of the trust equivalent to 23.06 percent of the total value of PTCs proposed to be issued.
 
Key Financials - Connect Residuary Private Limited
Particulars Unit FY23 (Prov.) FY22 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 40.85 38.86
PAT Rs. Cr. 11.90 12.08
PAT Margin (%) 29.13 31.08
TOL/TNW Times 3.99 4.32
PBDIT/Interest Times 50.44 51.26
 
Key Financials - Cherise India Private Limited (lessee)
Particulars Unit FY23 (Actual) FY22 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 36.67 16.14
PAT Rs. Cr. 2.94 1.49
PAT Margin (%) 8.02 9.24
TOL/TNW Times 1.39 1.57
PBDIT/Interest Times 3.64 6.13
 
Any other information
­Not applicable

Status of Non Cooperation with Other CRA

Not Applicable
 
Status of disclosure of all relevant information about the Obligation being Rated
­Non-public
 

Supplementary disclosures for Provisional Ratings

Risks associated with the provisional nature of the credit rating
­­­In case there are material changes in the terms of the transaction after the initial assignment of the provisional rating and post the completion of the issuance (corresponding to the part that has been issued) Acuité will withdraw the existing provisional rating and concurrently assign a fresh final rating in the same press release, basis the revised terms of the transaction.
Rating that would have been assigned in absence of the pending steps/ documentation
­­­In the absence of the pending steps/ documents the PTC structure would have become null and void, and Acuité would not have assigned any rating.
Timeline for conversion to Final Rating for a debt instrument proposed to be issued
­­­The provisional rating shall be converted into a final rating within 90 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. Under no circumstance shall the provisional rating continue upon the expiry of 180 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument.

Other Factors affecting Rating
Not Applicable
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument
­­­In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.
 
Applicable Criteria
 

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum (Rs. Cr.) Complexity Level Rating
Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass Through Certificate Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 5.87 Highly Complex Provisional | ACUITE BBB- | SO | Assigned

Contacts




About Acuité Ratings & Research

Acuité Ratings & Research Limitedwww.acuite.in