|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 775.00 | ACUITE A- | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
Non Convertible Debentures (NCD) | 40.00 | ACUITE A- | Reaffirmed & Withdrawn | - |
Non Convertible Debentures (NCD) | 110.00 | ACUITE A- | Stable | Reaffirmed | - |
Bank Loan Ratings | 25.00 | - | ACUITE A2+ | Reaffirmed |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 910.00 | - | - |
Total Withdrawn Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 40.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuité has reaffirmed the long-term rating of ‘ACUITE A-’ (read as ACUITE A minus) on the Rs. 775.00 Cr. bank facilities of Capital India Finance Limited (CIFL). The outlook is ‘Stable’. |
About the Company |
CIFL is a middle layer non deposit taking non-banking financial company (NBFC) registered with the Reserve Bank of India. The company is engaged in extending credit towards SME/MSME segment in form of Loan against Property and also extends corporate/structured finance loans. Presently, the company has expanded its borrower base and has been focusing on SME business class from their earlier exposure towards commercial real estate. |
Standalone (Unsupported) Rating |
ACUITE A- |
Analytical Approach
Extent of Consolidation |
•Full Consolidation |
Rationale for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support |
Acuité has adopted a consolidated approach and considered the business and financial risk profile of Capital India Finance Limited (CIFL) and its subsidiaries as on March 31, 2022, Capital India Home Loans Limited (CIHL) and Capital India Assets Management Private Limited (CIAM) for arriving at the rating. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strength |
Experienced management team backed by resourceful investors |
Weakness |
Susceptibility of the credit profile to large ticket exposures |
ESG Factors Relevant for Rating |
Capital India Finance Limited (CIFL) belongs to the Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC) sector which complements bank lending in India. Some of the material governance issues for the sector are policies and practices with regards to business ethics, board diversity and independence, compensation structure for board and KMPs, role of the audit committee and shareholders’ rights. On the social aspect, some of the critical issues for the sector are the contributions to financial inclusion and community development, sustainable financing including environmentally friendly projects and policies around data privacy. The industry, by nature has a low exposure to environmental risks. While CIFL was earlier engaged in extending wholesale credit towards real estate, LAP a nd corporate/structured finance loans, it has expanded its borrower base and has been focusing on SME loans which supports financial inclusion by financing of smaller businesses. The Capital India's board comprises of a total of six directors out of which four are independent directors and includes one female director. The executive chairman of the board is Dr Harsh Bhanwala who has been the ex- Chairman of NABARD with significant experience in financially inclusive businesses. The group companies maintains adequate disclosures with respect to the various board level committees mainly audit committee, nomination and renumeration committee along with stakeholder management committee. The group companies also maintains adequate level of transparency with regards to business ethics issues like related party transactions, investors grievances, litigations, and regulatory penalties for the group, if relevant. In terms of its social impact, CIFL is actively engaged in community development programmes through its CSR activities. |
Rating Sensitivity |
|
Material Covenants |
CIFL is subject to covenants stipulated by its lenders/investors in respect of various parameters like capital structure, asset quality, among others. |
Liquidity Position |
Adequate |
Business growth of CIFL has majorly been supported by equity funds, the company has now started to leverage its capital structure as reflected in gearing of 1.31 times as on March 31, 2022 (0.53 times as on March 31, 2021) (consolidated; CIFL & CIHL). The company has no significant term debt obligations over the near term. CIFL at consolidate level was able to obtain fundings from banks/lenders in the form of Term loans and Working capital facilities of around 270 Cr. during 9M FY2023. The company currently has cash and cash equivalents of ~Rs. 107 Cr., liquid investments in the form of mutual funds & bank deposits of Rs. 25.03 Cr. and undrawn limits of Rs. 135 Cr. as on September 30, 2022 (consolidated; CIFL & CIHL). The liquidity position of the company is expected to support the business growth of the company over the near term. |
Outlook: Stable |
Acuité believes that CIFL’s consolidated credit profile will be supported by its experienced management, support from resourceful promoters’/investor base and healthy capitalisation level. The outlook may be revised to ‘Positive’ in case the company is able to scale up its loan book significantly while maintaining its asset quality and profitability metrics. Conversely, the outlook may be revised to ‘Negative’ in case of significant deterioration in asset quality/ profitability metrics or increased concentration in portfolio towards real estate sector. |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Key Financials - Standalone / Originator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key Financials (Consolidated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
None |
Any Other Information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
Rating of Non-Banking Financing Entities - https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-44.htm |
Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contacts |
Analytical | Rating Desk |
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |