Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating
Bank Loan Ratings 300.00 ACUITE BB+ | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating* -
Total Outstanding 300.00 - -
 
Rating Rationale

­Acuité has downgraded  the rating to ‘ACUITE BB+’ (read as ACUITE double B plus) from 'ACUITE BBB+' (read as ACUITE triple B plus) on Rs.300Cr proposed bank facilities of Andhra Pradesh Gas Distribution Corporation Limited (APGDCL). The downgrade is on account of information risk. This rating is now an indicative rating as client has not submitted No Default Statement (NDS) for the past 6 months.


About the Company

­­Andhra Pradesh based APGDC was incorporated in 2011. APGDC is a joint venture company between GAIL Gas Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of GAIL (India) Ltd.), a Central Government Public Sector Enterprise (PSU) and Government of Andhra Pradesh through its public sector undertakings i.e. Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation Limited (APGIC), APGENCO Limited and APIIL Limited. APGDC has been authorised to lay, operate, expand Natural Gas Pipeline from Kakinada to Srikakulam (Total length of the pipeline is around 271 KM) through a bidding process carried out by Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB). The project is divided into 2 phases. Phase I runs from Kakinada to Vizag, which is of 169 Kms and Phase II runs from Vizag to Srikakulam, which is of 102 Kms.

 
Unsupported Rating
­ACUITE B+.
 
Non-cooperation by the issuer/borrower

­Acuité has been requesting for No Default Statements (NDS); however, despite multiple requests; the Company’s management has remained non-cooperative and not submitted the NDS for the preceding 03 consecutive months. Acuité has also been requesting for data, information and undertakings from the rated entity for conducting surveillance & review of the rating. However, the issuer/borrower failed to submit such information before the due date. Acuité believes that information risk is a critical component in such ratings, and noncooperation by the issuer along with unwillingness to provide information could be a sign of potential deterioration in its overall credit quality. This rating is therefore being flagged as “Issuer not cooperating”, in line with prevailing SEBI regulations and Acuité’s policies.

 
Limitation regarding information availability

­­The rating is based on information available from sources other than the issuer/borrower (in the absence of information provided by the issuer/borrower). Acuité has endeavoured to gather information about the entity/industry from the public domain. Therefore, Acuité cautions lenders and investors regarding the use of such information, on which the indicative credit rating is based.

 
Rating Sensitivities

­No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon

 
Liquidity Position

­No information provided by the issuer / available for Acuite to comment upon

 
Outlook: Not applicable
­
 
Other Factors affecting Rating
None
 

Particulars Unit FY 23 (Provisional) FY 22 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 0.00 0.00
PAT Rs. Cr. (31.55) (1.30)
PAT Margin (%) 0.00 0.00
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 0.95 0.56
PBDIT/Interest Times (0.11) (1682.32)
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA
­Not Applicable
 
Any other information

None

 
Applicable Criteria
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm
• Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-55.htm
• Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Group And Parent Support: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-47.htm
• Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm

Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument

­­In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in.

 

Date Name of Instruments/Facilities Term Amount (Rs. Cr) Rating/Outlook
29 Aug 2023 Proposed Term Loan Long Term 300.00 ACUITE BBB+ | Negative (Downgraded from ACUITE A-)
02 Jun 2022 Proposed Term Loan Long Term 300.00 ACUITE A- (Ratings Under Watch)
27 Jan 2021 Term Loan Long Term 200.00 ACUITE A- (CE) (Ratings Under Watch)
Term Loan Long Term 100.00 ACUITE A- (CE) (Ratings Under Watch)
­

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum
(Rs. Cr.)
Complexity Level Rating
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Term Loan Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 300.00 Simple ACUITE BB+ | Downgraded | Issuer not co-operating*
­

Contacts




About Acuité Ratings & Research

© Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved.www.acuite.in