|
Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
Bank Loan Ratings | 300.00 | ACUITE BBB+ | Negative | Downgraded | Remove from Rating Watch | - |
Total Outstanding Quantum (Rs. Cr) | 300.00 | - | - |
Rating Rationale |
Acuite has downgraded its long term rating to 'ACUITE BBB+' (read as ACUITE triple B plus) from 'ACUITE A-' (read as ACUITE A minus) on Rs.300 bank facilities of Andhra Pradesh Gas Distribution Corporation Limited (APGDC). The rating is removed from rating watch and outlook is 'Negative'. |
About the Company |
Andhra Pradesh based APGDC was incorporated in 2011. APGDC is a joint venture company between GAIL Gas Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of GAIL (India) Ltd.), a Central Government Public Sector Enterprise (PSU) and Government of Andhra Pradesh through its public sector undertakings i.e. Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation Limited (APGIC), APGENCO Limited and APIIL Limited. APGDC has been authorised to lay, operate, expand Natural Gas Pipeline from Kakinada to Srikakulam (Total length of the pipeline is around 271 KM) through a bidding process carried out by Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB). The project is divided into 2 phases. Phase I runs from Kakinada to Vizag, which is of 169 Kms and Phase II runs from Vizag to Srikakulam, which is of 102 Kms. |
Standalone (Unsupported) Rating |
ACUITE B+ /Negative |
Analytical Approach |
To arrive at rating, Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of APGDC and notched up the standalone rating by factoring in the strong operational and financial support extended by Gail Gas Limited (GGL) and Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation Limited. |
Key Rating Drivers
Strengths |
Strong operational and financial support from GGL and GoAP |
Weaknesses |
Significant delays in project completion |
Rating Sensitivities |
|
All Covenants |
None |
Liquidity Position: Adequate |
APGDC’s project is yet to commence operations. In the interim, the promoters are expected to support preoperative expenses and are expected to infuse funds to meet additional equity contribution arising on account of cost overrun as per the revised funding pattern. However, over the past three years, the execution of projects has slowed down due to lack of funding. |
Outlook: Negative |
Acuite has removed the rating watch and assigned negative outlook on account of continuous delays in the project execution and cost overruns. The project has been delayed due to limited funding support from Government of Andhra Pradesh and Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL). The rating may be downgraded if there are any further delays in project execution or if the expected funding support do not takes places resulting in delays. Conversely, the outlook may be to 'Stable' in case of receipt from expected funding support from the promoter companies |
Other Factors affecting Rating |
None |
Particulars | Unit | FY 23 (Provisional) | FY 22 (Actual) |
Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 0.00 | 0.00 |
PAT | Rs. Cr. | (31.55) | (1.30) |
PAT Margin | (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.95 | 0.56 |
PBDIT/Interest | Times | (0.11) | (1682.32) |
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
None |
Any other information |
None |
Applicable Criteria |
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Rating Process and Timeline: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-67.htm • Trading Entitie: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-61.htm • Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-55.htm |
Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument |
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Contacts |
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
Acuité Ratings & Research Limited | www.acuite.in |