|
|
| Product | Quantum (Rs. Cr) | Long Term Rating | Short Term Rating |
| Non Convertible Debentures (NCD) | 1330.00 | ACUITE BB+ | Negative | Downgraded | Stable to Negative | - |
| Non Convertible Debentures (NCD) | 70.00 | Provisional | ACUITE BB+ | Negative | Downgraded | Stable to Negative | - |
| Total Outstanding | 1400.00 | - | - |
|
In the previous PR dated 29 November 2022 the criteria for consolidation of companies was inadvertently missing and the same is incorporated in this erratum PR under applicable criteria. |
|
Rating Rationale |
|
Acuite has downgraded its long-term rating to ' Provisional ACUITE BB+ (read as Provisional ACUITE Double B plus)' from 'Provisional ACUITE BBB-' (read as Provisional ACUITE Triple B minus) on the Rs. 70 Cr. Proposed NCD of TARC Limited (TARC). The outlook has been revised to 'Negative' from 'Stable'. Further, Acuité has also downgraded its long-term rating to 'ACUITE BB+ (read as ACUITE Double B plus)' from 'ACUITE BBB-' (read as ACUITE Triple B minus) on the Rs.1330.00 crore Non Convertible Debentures of TARC Limited (TARC). The outlook is has been revised to 'Negative' from 'Stable'. The rating on the proposed Rs. 70 Cr. NCDs is provisional and the final rating is subject to the following documentation requirements: 1. Receipt of the executed trust deed 2. Receipt of the final term sheet and confirmation from trustee regarding the compliance with all the terms and conditions 3. Legal opinion on the transaction, if applicable 4. No due certificate from the existing lender or any document confirming the repayment of existing loans Rationale for the rating downgrade The rating downgraded primarily takes into account the increased management risk reflected in the recent adverse regulatory action by SEBI on TARC Limited (TARC). SEBI has imposed a penalty of Rs. 0.18 Cr. in its order dated November 18, 2022 for the 81 instances of non-compliance with the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Rules related to declaration of past defaults. Although the quantum of penalty is not expected impact the financial risk profile of TARC the non-disclosure of past defaults as per the regulation emphasizes the risk of lapses in process and internal controls. Prevention of any further lapses will remain a key rating sensitivity. |
| About Company |
|
Delhi based TARC Limited is a Public Limited Company incorporated in the year 2016. The Company is engaged in the real estate development business and is primarily pursuing significant residential projects in the NCR region. Pursuant to the Order of the Hon’ble NCLT Chandigarh on 24th August 2020 approving the demerger, the Company emerged as the resulting Company under the name and style of Anant Raj Global Limited, which was subsequently renamed as TARC Limited. TARC's current Chairman is Mr. Anil Sarin and the day to day operations of the Group are managed Mr. Amar Sarin – Managing Director and CEO. TARC proposes to issue NCDs aggregating to Rs 1400 Cr. As per the funds’ utilization plan, Rs. 1310 Cr. will be used to take over TARC's all existing outstanding debt and other liabilities identified under the terms of the NCD issue. The remaining Rs. 90 Cr. is available as construction finance for its residential project at Kapashera, New Delhi and the conversion of Moments Mall to a residential project.
|
| About the Group |
| TARC group subsidiaries (Refer Annexure II) are all engaged in real estate activities in NCR region. |
| Unsupported Rating |
| Not Applicable |
| Analytical Approach |
| Extent of Consolidation |
| •Full Consolidation |
| Rationale for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support |
| Acuite has considered the consolidated financial and business risk profile for TARC Limited. The list of entities consolidated in the financial is given below the Annexures table and together these are referred to as the Group or TARC.
|
| Key Rating Drivers |
| Strengths |
| Extensive experience of the management and established position of the company in NCR real estate market
The Chairman and the Managing Director and CEO have extensive experience in the real estate market in the NCR region. Mr. Anil Sarin, Chairman has been part of the industry for over four decades. TARC has an established position in the industry which is also reflected the large land bank and history of many completed projects. It has completed projects worth Rs. 3000 Cr. in the past and has a land bank of ~700 acres. Some of the key projects completed by TARC include projects like Maceo (15.57 acre), NH -8, Delhi (7.23 acre), Ocean’s Retreat, South Delhi (7.37 acre) and Moments Mall, Kirti Nagar, Delhi (6.12 acre). TARC is expected to benefit from extensive experience of the management and established presence in the real estate segment. Expected improvement in liquidity position TARC currently has Rs. 1117 Cr. of outstanding debt against its various projects. Its primary source of revenue was through the lease rentals from its various commercial properties. TARC's liquidity has been adversely impacted on account of the spread of Covid and the subsequent lockdowns which have adversely affected its lease rentals. This has resulted in significantly lower cash flows from majority of its leased properties against which a significant proportion of debt remains outstanding. A significant part of the NCD proceeds, i.e. Rs. 1310 Cr. will be used to pay all of its outstanding loans and the NCD investors will have access to cashflows from the all the projects and properties charged to the current lenders. According to the proposed terms, the NCD will have no repayment of interest up till March 2023 and principal till June 2023. Further, Rs. 90 Cr. of the NCD proceeds will remain available as construction support for TARC's two key projects with estimated sales potential in the range of Rs. 3700 - 4000 Cr. While the projects will still be exposed to demand risk, the proceeds from the proposed NCD are expected to improve TARC's liquidity position over the medium term. Comfort derived from the structure of the proposed NCD The proposed NCD issue will have access to all properties and projects of TARC under the existing lenders, post the refinancing exercise. All the cash flows from the existing project or any cash flows from sale of properties or receivables from the land acqusition transactions will be received in an account controlled by debenture trustees. The project completion milestones along with repayment milestones are in built in the terms of the NCDs. The following sources of funds have been identified for the repayment; a) Cash flows from the underlying projects. b) Inflows on account of part payment of certain land acquisition transactions. c) In case of any delay from the aforementioned cash flows or material delay in project progress which might result in cash flow mismatch, repayments to be completed through sale of Acuité Ratings & Research Limited www.acuite.in identified assets, as per the terms of the NCD. Any such asset sale process will be initiated |
| Weaknesses |
| Project Completion Risk
TARC's project and properties mortgaged to current lenders will be mortgaged against the proposed NCDs. Cash flow from these projects will be the primary source of repayment for the NCD besides proceeds from asset monetization. Kapashera Project and Moments Mall Project are the key projects out the all of TARC projects. These are currently at anascent stage of development and exposed to funding, execution and demand risk. The proposed NCDs also include Rs. 90 Cr. as construction finance towards the above mentioned two projects which will reduce the funding risk of the projects to some extent. For Maceo project the construction cost is almost entirely incurred and around ~Rs. 120 Cr. is receivable on sold and unsold flats within next 6 months. Besides the Rs. 90 Cr. construction finance, cashflow from Maceo project will also be used for the completion of the above mentioned two key projects. However, the projects are still exposed to execution and demand risk. These are mitigated to some extent on account of the favorable location of the projects in the NCR region and TARC's extensive experience in real estate development in the region. Kapashera is a luxury residential project which started in December 2021 and where currently excavation work is going on. It has 481000 square feet of saleable area with 230 units (excluding reserved for economically weaker sections). Total project cost is estimated to be in the range of Rs. 160 - 200 Cr. and currently 5 percent cost has been incurred. RERA approval is also in place for the project and its scheduled completion is by FY2025. Moments Mall project involves demolition of the current Moments Mall located near Kirti Nagar Station and construction of a residential complex. The project is expected to launch by FY2023 and demolition of the existing mall is underway. The total saleable area is ~1500000 square feet (excluding reserved for economically weaker sections) with estimated project cost in the range of Rs. 900-1000 Cr. There are other projects mortgaged to the issue however these are smaller relative to the key projects mention above and are currently in the planning stage. The timely commencement and completion of the key projects will remain a rating monitorable for Acuité. Susceptibility to real estate sector cyclicality and regulatory risks The real estate industry in India is highly fragmented with most of the real estate developers, having a city specific or region - specific presence. The risks associated with real estate industry are cyclical in nature of business (drop in property prices) and interest rate risk, among others, which could affect the operations. All players in the real estate sector are exposed to the risk of volatile prices on account of frequent demand supply mismatches in the industry. The real estate sector is under high stress on account of large amounts of unsold inventory and high borrowing costs. This is primarily attributable to the high residential property prices due to persistent rollover of bank debt, which has a cascading effect on the overall finance costs. Given the high degree of financial leverage, the high cost of borrowing inhibits the real estate developers' ability to significantly reduce prices to augment sales growth. However, this unsold inventory risk is mitigated in TARC's case given the location of its key projects in the NCR region where unsold inventory remains low.Further, the industry is exposed to regulatory risk, which is likely to impact players such as TARC, thereby impacting its operating capabilities. Past instances of delay in debt servicing observed TARC currently has Rs. 1117 Cr. debt outstanding against its various projects which are expected to be taken over by the proposed NCD issue. TARC's primary source of revenue was lease rental from its commercial properties. These have been severely impacted on account of spread of Covid-19 and the subsequent lockdowns. Thus, there have been instances of delays in servicing of principal and interest obligations in the past. These loans however, will be completely repaid from the proceeds of the proposed NCD issue. |
| ESG Factors Relevant for Rating |
|
Employee health & safety management is of primary importance to the construction industry given the nature of operations. Additionally, product quality and safety is of utmost significance. Human rights concerns such as forced labor are crucial considering the exploitative industry practices. Furthermore, responsible procurement and community relations are key influencing factors. The inherent material risk to the construction industry includes releasing toxic greenhouse gases and delivering a green building structure by utilizing clean technology. Factors such as ethical business practices, legal and regulatory compliance hold utmost significance in the construction industry, considering the frequency of litigations. Other issues include management compensation and Board oversight.
|
| Rating Sensitivities |
|
1. Commencement of key real estate projects as per the expected timeline without significant delay
2. Timely receipt of amount receivable from land acquisition transactions without significant delay 3. Any other adverse action from the regulator |
| Liquidity Position |
| Adequate |
|
Acuite expects TARC's liquidity profile to remain adequate post the successful issue of the proposed NCD on account adequate cushion between expected cash surplus and expected repayment obligations. TARC is expected to generate cash surplus in the range in of Rs. 300 - 500 Crore in FY2023-24 against no repayment obligation in FY2023 and ~Rs. 400 Crore in FY2024. The expected cash inflow includes receivable from land acquistion transaction in the range of Rs. 300-400 Cr.
|
| Outlook: Negative |
|
Acuite's revision in outlook to 'Negative' from 'Stable' takes into account the lapses in process and internal controls reflected in the adverse action taken by SEBI on TARC. The rating may be downgraded in case of any further adverse regulatory action on TARC or deterioration in operational performance and converely outlook may be revised to 'Stable' in case of sustained period of no regulatory actions and improvement in operating performance.
|
| Other Factors affecting Rating |
| None |
| Particulars | Unit | FY 21 (Actual) | FY 20 (Actual) |
| Operating Income | Rs. Cr. | 190.96 | 137.33 |
| PAT | Rs. Cr. | 6.17 | 53.10 |
| PAT Margin | (%) | 3.23 | 38.67 |
| Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth | Times | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| PBDIT/Interest | Times | 1.44 | 3.86 |
| Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable) |
| Not Applicable |
| Any Other Information |
|
Supplementary disclosures for Provisional Ratings
A. Risks associated with the provisional nature of the credit rating 1. Lack of third party monitoring of compliance in absence of executed trust deed and no finalized terms in absence of final term sheet 2. In case there are material changes in the terms of the transaction after the initial assignment of the provisional rating and post the completion of the issuance (corresponding to the part that has been issued) Acuite will withdraw the existing provisional rating and concurrently, assign a fresh final rating in the same press release, basis the revised terms of the transaction. B. Rating that would have been assigned in absence of the pending steps/ documentation The rating would be equated to the standalone rating of the entity: ACUITE BB+ / Negative. C. Timeline for conversion to Final Rating for a debt instrument proposed to be issued: The provisional rating shall be converted into a final rating within 90 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. Under no circumstance shall the provisional rating continue upon the expiry of 180 days from the date of issuance of the proposed debt instrument. |
| Applicable Criteria |
|
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm • Consolidation Of Companies: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-60.htm • Default Recognition: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm • Real Estate Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-63.htm |
| Note on Complexity Levels of the Rated Instrument |
|
In order to inform the investors about complexity of instruments, Acuité has categorized such instruments in three levels: Simple, Complex and Highly Complex. Acuite’ s categorisation of the instruments across the three categories is based on factors like variability of the returns to the investors, uncertainty in cash flow patterns, number of counterparties and general understanding of the instrument by the market. It has to be understood that complexity is different from credit risk and even an instrument categorized as 'Simple' can carry high levels of risk. For more details, please refer Rating Criteria “Complexity Level Of Financial Instruments” on www.acuite.in
|
|
| |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| *Annexure 2 - List of Entities (applicable for Consolidation or Parent / Group / Govt. Support) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contacts |
|
|
|
About Acuité Ratings & Research |
