Product Quantum (Rs. Cr) Long Term Rating Short Term Rating
Bank Loan Ratings 21.00 ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Reaffirmed -
Bank Loan Ratings 114.00 - ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed
Total Outstanding 135.00 - -
Total Withdrawn 0.00 - -
 
Rating Rationale

­­Acuite has reaffirmed its long term rating of 'ACUITE BB+' (read as ACUITE double B plus) and short term rating of 'ACUITE A4+' (read as ACUITE A four plus) on the Rs. 135.00 Cr. bank facilities of Veer Gems (VG). The outlook is remains 'Stable'.

Rationale for rating
The rating reaffirmation reflects the firm’s established operational track record and experienced management. It also factors in the company’s gradually improving financial risk profile. However, the rating remains constrained by the declining scale of operations, elongated working capital cycle, and stretched liquidity. This is due to the overall slowdown in the cut and polish diamond industry due to low demand, imposition of tariffs, competition from lab grown diamonds. The impact of current geopolitical developments will also remain a key monitorable.
Going forward, improvement in the net cash accruals leading to ease in the liquidity position will be a key monitorable.


About the Company

­Established in 1982, Veer Gems (VG) is a Mumbai based firm engaged in cutting and polishing of diamonds of small sizes. The firm is currently managed by its partners namely Mr. Piyushkumar Maneklal Shah, Mr. Mukesh Maneklal Shah, Mr. Dilip Maneklal Shah, Mr. Maulin Piyush Shah and Mr. Aadesh Dilip Shah.

 
Unsupported Rating
­Not Applicable
 
Analytical Approach

­Acuité has considered the standalone business and financial risk profile of VG to arrive at the rating.

 
Key Rating Drivers

Strengths

­Experienced management and establish track record of operations
VG has been operating since 1982 and deals in rough and polish diamonds ranging from smaller sizes (0.30 to 0.99 carats) to larger stones of up to 3 carats. The partners of have over four decades of experience in the gems and jewellery industry. The firm derives around 55 percent of its revenue from exports to key markets such as the UAE, Hong Kong, the USA, Belgium, and others. Around 80 percent of the firm’s revenue comes from diamonds below 1 carat, with the remaining 20 percent from stones above 1 carat. Hong Kong contributes the largest share of revenue at ~32 percent, followed by the UAE at ~23 percent.

Improving financial risk profile
The financial risk profile of VG is characterized by moderate networth, low gearing and average debt coverage metrics. The tangible networth of the firm stood at Rs. 165.29 Cr. post profit accretion against Rs. 162.44 Cr. in FY2024.
The gearing continues to remain below unity at 0.78 times along with moderate TOL/TNW levels of 1.24 times in FY2025. The Debt-EBITDA levels, though high, declined to 6.68 times in FY2025 from 7.22 times in FY2024. The interest coverage ratio (ICR) also improved marginally to 1.58 times in FY2025 from 1.50 times in FY2024. However, the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) stood low at 0.84 times in FY2025.
Going forward, improvement in the debt protection metrics will be a key monitorable.


Weaknesses

Declining operating performance
The operating revenue of the firm stood flat at Rs. 417.15 Cr. in FY2025 (Rs. 416.84 Cr. in PY), aided by the improved sales volumes despite declining realization prices. However, the declining trend continued further, leading to significant moderation in the revenue in FY2026 wherein revenue stood at Rs. 287.82 Cr. for 11M FY2026 as against Rs. 364.35 Cr. for the corresponding period in the previous year. This is due to the overall slowdown in the cut and polish diamond industry due to low demand, imposition of tariffs, competition from lab grown diamonds. Further, the impact of current geopolitical developments will also remain a key monitorable.
Further, the operating profitability margin declined and stood at 3.93 percent in FY2025 from 4.59 percent in FY2024. Although operating margin improved to 4.60 percent during 11M FY2026 due to cash discounts on early credit payments, the firm’s EBITDA margin has generally remained within the 3.5 – 4.5 percent range over the past years. On the other hand, the PAT margin improved to 1.19 percent in FY2025 from 0.96 percent in FY2024 on account of reduced finance cost, due to reduction in the overall debt levels.
Going forward, improvement in the net cash accruals will be a key rating sensitivity.

Intensive working capital operations
The intensive working capital cycle of the firm is evident from its high gross current assets (GCA) of 300 days in FY2025. The GCA days are driven by the high inventory period of 188 days and receivable period of 115 days in FY2025. On the other hand, the creditor days stood at 71, making the firm highly reliant on working capital limits to fund the cashflow gap. The average bank limit utilization stood at 94.27 percent for the last six months ended January 2026.
Going forward, improvement in the working capital cycle will be a key monitorable.

Inherent risk of capital withdrawal in a partnership firm
The firm is susceptible to the inherent risk of capital withdrawal given its constitution as a partnership firm. The partners had withdrawn some of their funds in FY2024, which had led to decline in the overall networth in FY2024 from FY2023. Any further significant withdrawal from the partner’s capital having a negative bearing on the financial risk profile of the firm shall be a key rating sensitivity.

Rating Sensitivities

Potential triggers (individual or collective) for an upward rating action:
­
  • Improvement in scale of operations with generation of NCAs more than Rs. 7 Cr
  • Significant improvement in the working capital cycle
Potential triggers (individual or collective) for a downward rating action:
­
  • Further decline in the financial risk profile with DSCR remaining below unity over the medium term.
  • Significant decline in scale of operations.
Liquidity Position
Stretched

The liquidity position of the firm is stretched, as evident from the low net cash accruals (NCAs) of Rs. 5.40 Cr. against repayment obligations of Rs. 8.84 Cr. in FY2025. Going forward, the NCAs are expected to remain stretched in the range of Rs. 3 – 5 Cr. against maturing obligations of Rs.8 – 3 Cr. in FY2026 and FY2027. The liquidity mismatch is expected to be supported by the promoters. The current ratio stood at 1.77 times on March 31, 2025. Further, the unencumbered cash and bank balance stood low at 0.67 Cr on March 31, 2025. Additionally, the bank limit utilization stood high at 94.27 percent for the last six months ended January 2026.

 
Outlook: Stable
­
 
Other Factors affecting Rating
­None
 

Particulars Unit FY 25 (Actual) FY 24 (Actual)
Operating Income Rs. Cr. 417.15 416.84
PAT Rs. Cr. 4.97 3.98
PAT Margin (%) 1.19 0.96
Total Debt/Tangible Net Worth Times 0.78 0.90
PBDIT/Interest Times 1.58 1.50
Status of non-cooperation with previous CRA (if applicable)
­Not Applicable
 
Any other information
­None
 
Applicable Criteria
• Default Recognition :- https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-52.htm
• Manufacturing Entities: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-59.htm
• Application Of Financial Ratios And Adjustments: https://www.acuite.in/view-rating-criteria-53.htm

Note on complexity levels of the rated instrument

Date Name of Instruments/Facilities Term Amount (Rs. Cr) Rating/Outlook
20 Dec 2024 PC/PCFC Short Term 20.00 ACUITE A4+ (Downgraded from ACUITE A3)
PC/PCFC Short Term 10.00 ACUITE A4+ (Downgraded from ACUITE A3)
PC/PCFC Short Term 20.00 ACUITE A4+ (Downgraded from ACUITE A3)
Post Shipment Credit Short Term 30.00 ACUITE A4+ (Downgraded from ACUITE A3)
Post Shipment Credit Short Term 40.00 ACUITE A4+ (Downgraded from ACUITE A3)
Proposed Long Term Bank Facility Long Term 15.00 ACUITE BB+ | Stable (Downgraded from ACUITE BBB- | Stable)
03 Oct 2023 PC/PCFC Short Term 20.00 ACUITE A3 (Assigned)
Post Shipment Credit Short Term 30.00 ACUITE A3 (Assigned)
PC/PCFC Short Term 10.00 ACUITE A3 (Assigned)
Post Shipment Credit Short Term 40.00 ACUITE A3 (Assigned)
PC/PCFC Short Term 20.00 ACUITE A3 (Assigned)
Proposed Long Term Bank Facility Long Term 15.00 ACUITE BBB- | Stable (Assigned)
­

Lender’s Name ISIN Facilities Date Of Issuance Coupon Rate Maturity Date Quantum
(Rs. Cr.)
Complexity Level Rating
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Not avl. / Not appl. FBN/FBP/FBD/PSFC/FBE Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 30.00 Simple ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed
INDUSIND BANK LIMITED Not avl. / Not appl. FBN/FBP/FBD/PSFC/FBE Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 44.00 Simple ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed
RBL Bank Not avl. / Not appl. PC/PCFC Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 20.00 Simple ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Not avl. / Not appl. PC/PCFC Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 20.00 Simple ACUITE A4+ | Reaffirmed
Not Applicable Not avl. / Not appl. Proposed Long Term Bank Facility Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. Not avl. / Not appl. 16.23 Simple ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Reaffirmed
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Not avl. / Not appl. Working Capital Term Loan 28 Feb 2022 Not avl. / Not appl. 31 Dec 2027 2.28 Simple ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Reaffirmed
INDUSIND BANK LIMITED Not avl. / Not appl. Working Capital Term Loan 24 Mar 2021 Not avl. / Not appl. 29 Feb 2028 2.49 Simple ACUITE BB+ | Stable | Reaffirmed

Contacts

About Acuité Ratings & Research

© Acuité Ratings & Research Limited. All Rights Reserved.www.acuite.in